Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling spiky acceleration response of dilative sand deposits during earthquakes with emphasis on large post-liquefaction deformation

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The acceleration records at some liquefied sand deposits exhibit a distinctive spiky waveform, characterized by strong amplification and high-frequency components. A comprehensive constitutive model was used to analyze the mechanism of such spiky acceleration responses. An idealized single-degree-of-freedom (SDF) system was constructed, in which the force-displacement relation of the spring follows the stress-strain behavior of saturated sand during undrained shearing. The SDF system demonstrated that the spikes are directly related to the strain-hardening behavior of sand during post-liquefaction cyclic shearing. Furthermore, there exists a threshold shear strain length, which is in accordance with the limited amplitude of the fluid-like shear strain generated at instantaneous zero effective stress state during the post-liquefaction stage. The spiky acceleration can only occur when the cyclic shear strain exceeds the threshold shear strain length. It is also revealed that the time intervals between the acceleration spikes increase gradually along with the continuation of shaking because the threshold shear strain length increases gradually and then more time is needed to generate larger shear strain to cause strain hardening. Records at the Kushiro Port site and Port Island site during past earthquakes are simulated through the fully coupled method to validate the presented mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre J and Irikura K (1997), “Nonlinearity, Liquefaction, and Velocity Variation of Soft Soil Layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87(5): 1244–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arulanandan K and Scott RF (1993), “Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems,” Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Davis, California, USA, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Balkema. Bhattacharya S, Hyodo M, Goda K, Tazoh T and Taylor CA (2011), “Liquefaction of Soil in the Tokyo Bay Area from the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) Earthquake,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(11): 1618–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla LF, Archuleta RJ and Lavallée D (2005), “Hysteretic and Dilatant Behavior of Cohesionless Soils and Their Effects on Nonlinear Site Response: Field Data Observations and Modeling,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(6): 2373–2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA (2012), “Strong Ground Motion Characteristics Observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield, New Zealand Earthquake,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 42(4): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro G (1975), “Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility of Saturated Sands,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(GT6): 551–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro G and Poulos SJ (1977), “Factors Affecting Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 103(GT6): 501–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan AHC (1993), User’s Manual for DIANASWANDYNE II, School of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafalias YF (1986). “Bounding Surface Plasticity, I: Mathematical Foundation and Hypoplasticity,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 112(12): 1263–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Yang Z and Parra E (2002), “Computational Modeling of Cyclic Mobility and Post-Liquefaction Site Response,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(4): 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingery JR, Elgamal A and Bray JD (2015), “Response Spectra at Liquefaction Sites during Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, 31(4): 2325–2349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha I, Olson S, Seo M and Kim M (2011), “Evaluation of Reliquefaction Resistance Using Shaking Table Tests,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(4): 682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TL and Youd TL (2007), “Liquefaction, Ground Oscillation, and Soil Deformation at the Wildlife Array, California,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(3): 961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TL, Hanks TC and Youd TL (1989), “Dynamics of Liquefaction during the 1987 Superstition Hills, California, Earthquake,” Science, 244(4900): 56–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zheng H, Mao W, Huang M and Li G (2012), “Triaxial Tests on the Fluidic Behavior of Post-Liquefaction Sand,” Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(8): 2325–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Hyde Afland Aramaki N (1998), “Liquefaction of Crushable soils,” Géotechnique, 48(4): 527–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S, Morita T, Kameoka T, Matsunaga Y and Abiko K (1995), “Response of a Dense Sand Deposit during 1993 Kushiro-Oki Earthquake,” Soils and Foundations, 35(1): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Yasuda S and Nagase H (1996), “Soil Characteristics and Ground Damage,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake, 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki Y and Tai M (1996), “Strong Motion Records at Kobe Port Island,” Soils and Foundations, Special Issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamae K, Irikura K and Pitarka A (1998), “A Technique for Simulating Strong Ground Motion Using Hybrid Green’s Function,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88(2): 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamagata S and Takewaki I (2015), “Nonlinear Transient Behavior during Soil Liquefaction Based on Re-Evaluation of Seismic Records” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 71: 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyota T, Koseki J and Sato T (2013), “Relationship Between Limiting Shear Strain and Reduction of Shear Moduli due to Liquefaction in Large Strain Torsional Shear Tests,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 49(1): 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinov MV and Towhata I (2002), “Assessment of Liquefaction-Inducing Peak Ground Velocity and Frequency of Horizontal Ground Shaking at Onset of Phenomenon,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(4): 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996), “Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering,” Prentice-Hall Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Series, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Xuening, Liu Huishan, Zhou Genshou and Wang Shifeng (1992), “Study on Shake-Reducing Effect of Liquefiable Layers,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 12(3): 84–91. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966), “Liquefaction of Saturated Sands during Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE, 92(SM6): 105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Su D, Ming HY and Li XS (2013). “Effect of Shaking Strength on the Seismic Response of Liquefiable Level Ground,” Engineering Geology, 166(8): 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Rui and Yuan Xiaoming (2004), “Analysis on Feature of Surface Ground Motion for Liquefied Soil Layer,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Journal, 25(5): 684–690. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP and Thomas J (1995), “Liquefaction and Post-Liquefaction Behavior of Sand,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 121(2): 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakai A and Nozu A (2011), “The Strong Motion Observation Network in Japanese Ports,” in NEES Workshop: Using the NEES Equipment Site Facilities in ESG Research and International Collaborations, University of Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Gang and Zhang Jianmin (2007), “A Cyclic Elastoplastic Constitutive Model for Evaluating Large Liquefaction-Induced Deformation of Sand,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 29(1): 51–59. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL, Dafalias YF and Shen CK (1990), “Bounding Surface Hypoplasticity Model for Sand,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 116(5): 983–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Sato T, Savidis S and Li XS (2002), “Horizontal and Vertical Components of Earthquake Ground Motions at Liquefiable Sites,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(3): 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S, Masuda T, Yoshida N, Nagase H, Kiku H, Itafuji S, Mine K and Sata K (1994), “Torsional Shear and Triaxial Compression Tests on Deformation Characters of Sands before and after Liquefaction,” Proceedings of 5th US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifelines and Countermeasures against Soil Liquefaction, Salt Lake City, Technical Report NCEER-94-0026, National Center for Earthquake Engineering, USA, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Kiku M, Masuda T and Finn WDL (1994), “Behavior of Sand after Liquefaction,” Proceedings of 5th U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifelines and Countermeasures against Soil Liquefaction, Salt Lake City, Technical Report NCEER-94-0026, National Center for Earthquake Engineering, USA, 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL and Carter BL (2005), “Influence of Soil Softening and Liquefaction on Spectral Acceleration,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 131(7): 811–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M and Elgamal A (1994), “Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 20(6): 996–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JM and Wang G (2012), “Large Post-Liquefaction Deformation of Sand, Part I: Physical Mechanism, Constitutive Description and Numerical Algorithm,” Acta Geotechnica, 7(2): 69–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Enquan, Wang Zhihua, Chen Guoxing and Lu Cong (2015), “Constitutive Model for Fluid of Post-Liquefied Sand,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 37(1): 112–118. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Chan AHC, Schrefler BA and Shiomi T (1999), Computational Geomechanics with Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The present study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51209179, 51679016) and the Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering (SKLHSE-2015-D-03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Wang.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51209179, 51679016) and the Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering (SKLHSE-2015-D-03)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, G., Wei, X. & Zhao, J. Modelling spiky acceleration response of dilative sand deposits during earthquakes with emphasis on large post-liquefaction deformation. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 17, 125–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0429-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0429-x

Keywords

Navigation