Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental research on behavior of 460 MPa high strength steel I-section columns under cyclic loading

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the seismic behavior of I-section columns made of 460 MPa high strength steel (HSS), six specimens were tested under constant axial load and cyclic horizontal load. The specimens were designed with different width-to-thickness ratios and loaded under different axial load ratios. For each specimen, the failure mode was observed and hysteretic curve was measured. Comparison of different specimens on hysteretic characteristic, energy dissipation capacity and deformation capacity were further investigated. Test results showed that the degradation of bearing capacity was due to local buckling of flange and web. Under the same axial load ratio, as width-to-thickness ratio increased, the deformation area of local buckling became smaller. And also, displacement level at both peak load and failure load became smaller. In addition, the full extent of hysteretic curve, energy dissipation capacity, ultimate story drift angle decreased, and capacity degradation occurred more rapidly with the increase of width-to-thickness ratio or axial load ratio. Based on the capacity of story drift angle, limiting values which shall not be exceeded are suggested respectively for flange and web plate of 460 MPa HSS I-section columns when used in SMFs and in IMFs in the case of axial load ratio no more than 0.2. Such values should be smaller when the axial load ratio increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISC (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANIS/AISC 341-10, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballio G and Calado L (1986), “Steel Bent Section under Cyclic Loads: Experiments and Numerical Approaches,” Construzioni Metalliche, (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban Huiyong, Shi Gang and Shi Yongjiu et al. (2012), “Overall Buckling Behavior of 460 MPa High Strength Steel Columns: Experimental Investigation and Design Method,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 74(4): 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beg D and Hladnik L (1996), “Slenderness Limit of Class 3 I Cross-sections Made of High Strength Steel,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 38(8): 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorhovde R (2004), “Development and Use of High Performance Steel,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(3–5): 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance: Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, BSEN 1998-1, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2005), Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, BSEN 1993-1-1, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho AMG and Bijlaard FSK (2007), “Experimental Behaviour of High Strength Steel End-plate Connections,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(9): 1228–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho AMG and Bijlaard FSK (2009), “Experimental Behaviour of High-strength Steel Web Shear Panels,” Engineering Structures, 31(7): 1543–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GB 50011-2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge Hanbin, Gao Shengbin and Usami Tsutomu (2000), “Stiffened Steel Box Columns. Part 1: Cyclic Behavior,” Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 29(11): 1691–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IABSE (2005), Use and Application of Highperformance Steels for Steel Structures, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 6892-1 (2009), Metallic Materials — tensile Testing- Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature, Information Handling Services, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • JGJ 101-96 (1997), Specification of Testing Methods for Earthquake Resistant Building, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miki C, Homma K, and Tominaga T (2002), “High Strength and High Performance Steels and Their Use in Bridge Structures,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58(1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima Masayoshi, Liu Dawei (2005), “Instability and Complete Failure of Steel Columns Subjected to Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131(6): 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell JD, Uang CM (2008), “Cyclic Behavior of Steel Wide-flange Columns Subjected to Large Drift,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(8):1334–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie J, Bai Y, Cai CS (2008), “New Connection System for Confined Concrete Columns and Beams. I: Experimental Study,” ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(12): 1787–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock G (2006), “High Strength Steel Use in Australia, Japan and the US,” Structural Engineering, 84(21): 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen KJR, Hancock GJ (1992), “Plate Slenderness Limits for High Strength Steel Sections,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 23(1): 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen KJR, Hancock GJ (1995), “Test of High Strength Steel Columns,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 34(1): 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Gang, Ban Huiyong and Bijlaard FSK (2012a), “Tests and Numerical Study of Ultra-high Strength Steel Columns with End Restraints,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70(3): 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Gang, Liu Zhao and Ban Huiyong et al. (2012b), “Te. sts and Finite Element Analysis on the Local Buckling of 420 MPa Steel Equal Angle Columns under Axial Compression,” Steel and Composite Structures, 12(1): 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Gang, Wang Jiaojiao and Bai Yu et al. (2014), “Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of 460 MPa High Strength Steel Box-section Columns,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(7): 1045–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Gang, Wang Meng and Bai Yu et al. (2012c), “Experimental and Modeling Study of High-strength Structural Steel under Cyclic Loading,” Engineering Structures, 37(4):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usami T and Fukumoto Y (1982), “Local and Overall Buckling of Welded Box Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, 108(ST3): 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usami Tsutomu, Gao Shengbin and Ge Hanbin (2000), “Stiffened Steel Box Columns. Part 2: Ductility Evaluation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 29(11): 1707–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Shi.

Additional information

Supported by: the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51478244

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Shi, G. & Shi, Y. Experimental research on behavior of 460 MPa high strength steel I-section columns under cyclic loading. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 13, 611–622 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0267-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0267-4

Keywords

Navigation