Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of plant species number on productivity, ground coverage and floral performance in grass-free lawns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The grass-free lawn is a novel development in modern ornamental horticulture where the traditional monoculture of grass is replaced by a variety of mowing-tolerant clonal forbs. It brings floral aesthetics and a diverse species approach to the use of lawn space. How the number of constituent forb species affects the aesthetic and structural performance of grass-free lawns was investigated using grass-free lawns composed of four, six and twelve British native clonal perennial forb species. Lawn productivity was seen to increase with increasing species number, but the relationship was not linear. Plant cover was dynamic in all lawn types, varied between years and was not representative of individual species’ floral performance. The behaviour of component species common to all lawns suggested that lawns with 12 species show greater structural stability than lawns with lower species number. Visual performance in lawns with the greatest species number was lower than in lawns with fewer species, with increasing variety in floral size and individual species floral productivity, leading to a trade-off between diversity and floral performance. Individual species were seen to have different aesthetic functions in grass-free lawns by providing flowers, ground coverage or both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (2011) National Soil Resources Institute. Available: http://www.landis.org.uk/sitereporter/. Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • Anon (2012) UK Climate: Summer 2012. Available: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/2012/summer.html. Accessed 01 Dec 2012

  • Barnhart, SK (1998) Estimating available pasture forage. Available: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1758.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2010

  • Borman FH, Balmori D, Geballe TG (2001) Redesigning the American lawn. A search for environmental harmony. Yale University Press, New Haven & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crider, FJ (1955) Root growth stoppage resulting from defoliation of grass. Technical Bulletin 1102. US Department of Agriculture

  • Daniels S (1995) The wild lawn handbook: alternatives to the traditional front lawn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnet N, Hitchmough J (2004) The dynamic landscape. Design, ecology and management of naturalistic urban planting. Taylor & Francis, London & New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin JN, O’Gorman EJ, Emmerson MC, Jenkins SR, Klein AM, Loreau M, Symstad A (2009) Biodiversity and the stability of ecosystem functioning. In: Naeem S, Bunker E, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross K, Cardinale BJ, Fox JW, Gonzalez A, Loreau M, Polley HW, Reich PB, van Ruijven J (2014) Species richness and the temporal stability of biomass production: a new analysis of recent biodiversity experiments. Am Nat 183:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HAAHR M (2010) True random number service. (Online). Available: http://www.random.org/2010

  • Hadden EJ (2012) Beautiful No-Mow Yards. 50 amazing lawn alternatives. Timber, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Korner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’donovan G, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA, Fridley JD, Garnier E, Grime JP, Hodgeson JG, Lauenroth WK, Thompson K, Vandermeer JH, Wardle DA (2000) No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289(5483):1255–1255

  • Ignatieva ME, Stewart GH (2009) Homogeneity of urban biotopes and similarity of landscape design language in former colonial cities. In: Mcdonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques WA, Edmond DB (1952) Root development in some common New Zealand pasture plants V. The effect of defoliation and root pruning on cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) and perennial rye-grass (Lolium perenne). NZ J Sci 34:231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins VS (1994) The lawn: a history of an American obsession. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, Cook E, Strawhacker C, Hall SJ (2010) The influence of diverse values, ecological structure, and geographic context on residents’ multifaceted landscaping decisions. Hum Ecol 38:747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E (2007) Species richness, structural diversity and species composition in meadows created by visitors of a botanical garden in Switzerland. Landsc Urban Plan 79:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P, Junge X, Matthies D (2010) The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biol Conserv 143:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan LR (2006) Understanding cultural reasons for the increase in both restoration efforts and gardening with native plants. Nativ Plants 7:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINITAB (2012) Minitab 16 Statistical Software. Minitab Inc.

  • Mulder CPH, Jumpponen A, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K (2002) How plant diversity and legumes affect nitrogen dynamics in experimental grassland communities. Community Ecol 133:312–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller N, Werner P (2010) Urban biodiversity and the case for implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities. In: Müller N, Werner P, Kelcey JG (eds) Urban Biodiversity and Design. Wiley–Blackwell, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1995) Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landsc J 14:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang Z, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbours think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn E, Lozier J (2003) A falling plate meter for estimating pasture forage mass. Available: http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/forglvst/fallplate.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2010

  • Robbins P (2007) Lawn people. How grasses, weeds and chemicals make us who we are. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P, Sharp J (2003) The lawn-chemical economy and its discontents. Antipode 35:955–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W (1995) A man’s turf: the perfect lawn. Clarkson Potter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples P, Hayman, Steven (2008) The Lawn Guide. The easy way to a perfect lawn, S&H Publishing

  • Smith LS, Fellowes MDE (2013) Towards a lawn without grass: the journey of the imperfect lawn and its analogues. Stud Hist Gard Des Landsc 33:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LS, Fellowes E (2014a) The grass-free lawn: floral performance and management implications. (unpublished data, in review)

  • Smith LS, Fellowes E (2014b) The grass-free lawn: management and species choice for optimum ground cover and plant diversity. Urban For Urban Green, 13 (in press)

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berga AE, Vleka CAJ, Coeterierb JF (1998) Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: a multilevel approach. J Environ Psychol 18:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Royal Horticultural Society of Great Britain, the Garden Centre Association’s Dick Allen Scholarship Fund, Mr Simon Bass and the Finnis–Scott Foundation for kindly supporting this study. All research carried out complies with UK law and accepted research practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel S. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, L.S., Fellowes, M.D.E. The influence of plant species number on productivity, ground coverage and floral performance in grass-free lawns. Landscape Ecol Eng 11, 249–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0264-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0264-9

Keywords

Navigation