Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental validation of a signal-based approach for structural earthquake damage detection using fractal dimension of time frequency feature

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article extends a signal-based approach formerly proposed by the authors, which utilizes the fractal dimension of time frequency feature (FDTFF) of displacements, for earthquake damage detection of moment resist frame (MRF), and validates the approach with shaking table tests. The time frequency feature (TFF) of the relative displacement at measured story is defined as the real part of the coefficients of the analytical wavelet transform. The fractal dimension (FD) is to quantify the TFF within the fundamental frequency band using box counting method. It is verified that the FDTFFs at all stories of the linear MRF are identical with the help of static condensation method and modal superposition principle, while the FDTFFs at the stories with localized nonlinearities due to damage will be different from those at the stories without nonlinearities using the reverse-path methodology. By comparing the FDTFFs of displacements at measured stories in a structure, the damage-induced nonlinearity of the structure under strong ground motion can be detected and localized. Finally shaking table experiments on a 1:8 scale sixteen-story three-bay steel MRF with added frictional dampers, which generate local nonlinearities, are conducted to validate the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Canus C, Goncalves P, Guiheneuf B and Vehel JL (2013), Available from: http://fraclab.saclay.inria.fr/ (last accessed 26 March 2013).

  • Chanpheng T, Yamada H, Katsuchi H and Sasaki E (2012), “Nonlinear Features for Damage Detection on Large Civil Structures due to Earthquakes,” Structural Health Monitoring, 11(4): 482–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB and Shevitz DW (1996), “Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: a Literature Review,” Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar CR, Worden K, Todd MD, Park G, Nichols J, Adams DE, Bement MT and Farinholt K (2007), “Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection,” Report LA-14353S, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou Z, Noori M and Amand RS (2000), “Wavelet-based Approach for Structural Damage Detection,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(7): 677–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E, Fletcher JPB, Leith WS, McCarthy J and Banga K (2012), “Real-time Seismic Monitoring of Instrumented Hospital Buildings,” USGS Fact Sheet 2012-3028, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Tao D, Huang Y and Bao Y (2013), “A Data-driven Approach for Seismic Damage Detection of Sheartype Building Structures Using the Fractal Dimension of Time-frequency Features,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 20(9): 1191–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh CH, Mao CH, Chao SH and Weng JH (2010), “Feature Extraction and System Identification of Reinforced Concrete Structures Considering Degrading Hysteresis,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17(7): 712–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masri S, Sassi H and Caughey T (1982), “Nonparametric Identification of Nearly Arbitrary Nonlinear System,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 49(3): 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajaiah S and Basu B (2009), “Output Only Modal Identification and Structural Damage Detection Using Time Frequency & Wavelet Techniques,” Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration, 8(4): 583–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou J and Li H (2010), “Structural Health Monitoring in Mainland China: Review and Future Trends,” Structural Health Monitoring, 9(3): 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan TC and Lee CL (2002), “Application of Wavelet Theory to Identify Yielding in Seismic Response of Bi-linear Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(2): 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YJ, Ang AHS and Wen YK (1985), “Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(4): 740–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEER Strong Motion Database (2013), Available from: http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data.html (last accessed 26 March 2013)

  • Qiao L and Esmaeily A (2011), “An Overview of Signal-Based Damage Detection Methods,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 94: 834–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice H and Fitzpatrick J (1991), “A Procedure for the Identification of Linear and Non-linear Multi-degree-of-freedom Systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 149(3): 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR and Czarnecki JJ (2004), “A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001,” Report LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos P, Giaralis A and Politis N (2007), “Time-frequency Representation of Earthquake Accelerograms and Inelastic Structural Response Records Using the Adaptive Chirplet Decomposition and Empirical Mode Decomposition,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(7): 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovska MI and Trifunac MD (2007), “Earthquake Damage Detection in the Imperial County Services Building I: The Data and Time-frequency Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(6): 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M and Smyth AW (2007), “Application of the Unscented Kalman Filter for Real-time Nonlinear Structural System Identification,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 14(7): 971–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Li.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 51161120359, Ministry of Education under Grant No. 20112302110050 and Special Fund for Earthquake Scientific Research in the Public Interest under Grant No. 201308003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, D., Mao, C., Zhang, D. et al. Experimental validation of a signal-based approach for structural earthquake damage detection using fractal dimension of time frequency feature. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 13, 671–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0271-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0271-8

Keywords

Navigation