Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of thoracic aortic conformational changes by four-dimensional computed tomography angiography in patients with chronic aortic dissection type b

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To characterize the heartbeat-related distension of dissected and non-dissected thoracic aortic segments in chronic aortic dissection type b (CADB) ECG-gated computed tomography angiography was performed in ten CADB patients. For 20 time points of the R–R interval, multiplanar reformations were taken at non-dissected (A, B) and dissected (C) aorta: ascending aorta (A), aortic vertex (B), 10 cm distal to left subclavian (Ct, true channel; Cf, false channel). Relative amplitudes of aortic area and major and minor axis diameter changes were quantified. Area amplitudes were 12.9 ± 3.7%, 11.4 ± 1.8%, 16.5 ± 5.9% and 10.5 ± 5.7% at A, B, Ct and Cf, respectively. Area amplitudes were significantly greater at Ct than at Cf and B (p < 0.05). Major axis diameter amplitudes were 7.7 ± 1.9%, 6.2 ± 1.3%, 5.9 ± 2.0% and 6.1 ± 3.6% at A, B, Ct and Cf, respectively. There were no differences in major axis diameter amplitudes. Minor axis diameter amplitudes were 6.7 ± 2.1%, 8.4 ± 1.9%, 12.7 ± 6.3% and 6.0 ± 2.2% at A, B, Ct and Cf, respectively. Minor axis diameter amplitudes were significantly the greatest at Ct (p < 0.05). In CADB, the heartbeat-related distension of aortic area and diameter is evenly distributed over the non-dissected aortic arch. As a result from different blood flow properties, there are significantly greater conformational changes in the true channel of the dissected aorta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meszaros I, Morocz J, Szlavi J et al (2000) Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest 117:1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gleason TG (2005) Heritable disorders predisposing to aortic dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 17:274–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shennan T (1934) Dissecting aneurysms special report. Medical Research Council, London

  4. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW et al (1993) Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc 68:642–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coselli JS, de Figueiredo LF (1997) Natural history of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Card Surg 12:285–289 discussion 289–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM et al (2000) The international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283:897–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McGee EC Jr, Pham DT, Gleason TG (2005) Chronic descending aortic dissections. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 17:262–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ince H, Nienaber CA (2007) Etiology, pathogenesis and management of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 4:418–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schumacher H, Böckler D, Allenberg JR (2004) Surgical management of thoracic aortic lesions. Aneurysm, dissection and traumatic rupture. Chirurg 75:937–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winnerkvist A, Lockowandt U, Rasmussen E et al (2006) A prospective study of medically treated acute type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:349–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Czermak BV, Waldenberger P, Fraedrich G et al (2000) Treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection with stent-grafts: preliminary results. Radiology 217:544–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopera J, Patino JH, Urbina C et al (2003) Endovascular treatment of complicated type-B aortic dissection with stent-grafts: midterm results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:195–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Riesenman PJ, Farber MA, Mendes RR et al (2005) Endovascular repair of lesions involving the descending thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg 42:1063–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone DH, Brewster DC, Kwolek CJ et al (2006) Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results. J Vasc Surg 44:1188–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Böckler D, Schumacher H, Ganten M et al (2006) Complications after endovascular repair of acute symptomatic and chronic expanding Stanford type B aortic dissections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thurnher SA, Grabenwoger M (2002) Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a review. Eur Radiol 12:1370–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fattori R, Napoli G, Lovato L et al (2003) Descending thoracic aortic diseases: stent-graft repair. Radiology 229:176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Tommaso L, Monaco M, Mottola M et al (2006) Major complications following endovascular surgery of descending thoracic aorta. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 5:705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nienaber CA, Kische S, Ince H (2007) Thoracic aortic stent-graft devices: problems, failure modes, and applicability. Semin Vasc Surg 20:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weigel S, Tombach B, Maintz D et al (2003) Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results. Eur Radiol 13:1628–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Willoteaux S, Lions C, Gaxotte V et al (2004) Imaging of aortic dissection by helical computed tomography (CT). Eur Radiol 14:1999–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Böckler D, Hylik-Dürr A, von Tengg-Kobligk H et al (2007) Clinical requirements of aortic imaging. Radiologe 47:962–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huber A, Matzko M, Wintersperger BJ et al (2001) Reconstruction methods in postprocessing of CT- and MR-angiography of the aorta. Radiologe 41:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker MV, O’Donnell SD, Chang AS et al (2005) What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 41:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ganten M, Boese JM, Leitermann D et al (2005) Quantification of aortic elasticity: development and experimental validation of a method using computed tomography. Eur Radiol 15:2506–2512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganten M, Krautter U, Hosch W et al (2007) Age related changes of human aortic distensibility: evaluation with ECG-gated CT. Eur Radiol 17:701–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ganten M, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Weber TF et al (2008) Charakterisierung der Membranbewegung bei Patienten mit chronischer B-Dissektion mittels EKG-getriggerter CT. Rofo 180:S157

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muhs BE, Vincken KL, van Prehn J et al (2006) Dynamic cine-CT angiography for the evaluation of the thoracic aorta; insight in dynamic changes with implications for thoracic endograft treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:532–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Prehn J, Vincken KL, Muhs BE et al (2007) Toward endografting of the ascending aorta: insight into dynamics using dynamic cine-CTA. J Endovasc Ther 14:551–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Herold U, Piotrowski J, Baumgart D et al (2002) Endoluminal stent graft repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection and atherosclerotic aneurysm of the thoracic aorta: an interdisciplinary task. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:891–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sternbergh WC 3rd, Money SR, Greenberg RK et al (2004) Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the Zenith Multicenter Trial. J Vasc Surg 39:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohan IV, Laheij RJ, Harris PL (2001) Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimono T, Kato N, Yasuda F et al (2002) Transluminal stent-graft placements for the treatments of acute onset and chronic aortic dissections. Circulation 106:I241–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schumacher H, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, Ostovic M et al (2006) Hybrid aortic procedures for endoluminal arch replacement in thoracic aneurysms and type B dissections. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:509–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang JM, Friese K, Caputo GR et al (1991) MR measurement of blood flow in the true and false channel in chronic aortic dissection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:418–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Inoue T, Watanabe S, Sakurada H et al (2000) Evaluation of flow volume and flow patterns in the patent false lumen of chronic aortic dissections using velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn Circ J 64:760–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD et al (2004) Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:459–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu SD, Huang FJ, Du JH et al (2008) A study of aortic dimension in type B aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7(2):244–8 Epub 2008 Jan 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kortesniemi M, Kiljunen T, Kangasmaki A (2006) Radiation exposure in body computed tomography examinations of trauma patients. Phys Med Biol 51:3269–3282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Duvernoy O, Coulden R, Ytterberg C (1995) Aortic motion: a potential pitfall in CT imaging of dissection in the ascending aorta. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:569–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beller CJ, Labrosse MR, Thubrikar MJ et al (2004) Role of aortic root motion in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection. Circulation 109:763–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim F. Weber.

Additional information

Tim F. Weber and Maria-Katharina Ganten contributed equally

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, T.F., Ganten, MK., Böckler, D. et al. Assessment of thoracic aortic conformational changes by four-dimensional computed tomography angiography in patients with chronic aortic dissection type b. Eur Radiol 19, 245–253 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1103-x

Keywords

Navigation