Abstract
Although there are psychogenic consequences of impotence for all impotent men, it is assumed that the psychogenic causes of impotence will only be evident in those men diagnosed as psychogenically impotent. Research into the psychogenic causes of impotence has been sparse. We developed a model of psychogenic impotence, and compared a group of organically impotent men and a group of psychogenically impotent men. Ninety subjects were selected from those referred to our multi-disciplinary sexual dysfunction clinic. It was hypothesised that psychogenically impotent men would score higher in the categories of problems with sexuality, interactional problems, lovemaking and relationship problems, companionship, friendship and partnership problems, problems in the family situation, and life stresses: and, that organically impotent men would score higher in the health problems category. The results suggested that interactional problems between patient and partner were common to both diagnostic groups, and that in all other categories (with the exception of health problems) psychogenically impotent men experienced more difficulty (p<.05). Organically impotent men, as expected, exhibited more health problems (p<.05); however, a large number of psychogenically impotent patients suffered from the same health problems. It was suggested that some psychogenically impotent men suffered from an insidious organic deterioration which was undectable at the time of diagnosis, and that with the progress of time, the diagnosis of some of these patients might change to organic impotence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collins, WE, McKendry, JBP, Silverman, M, Krul, LE, Collins, JP & Irvine, AH: Multi-disciplinary survey of erectile impotence.Can Med Assoc J. 128:1393–1399, 1983.
Condra, M, Morales, A, Surridge, D, Marshall, P, & Fenemore, J: Evaluation of the urological assessment in impotence: Findings with a new diagnostic rating scale.The J of Urol, 131:486–90, 1984.
Kockott, G, Feil, W, Revenstorf, D, Aldenhoff, J & Besinger, U: Symtomatology and psycholgical aspects of male sexual inadequacy: Results of an experimental study.Arch of Sexual Behav, 9:457–475, 1980.
Marshall, P, Morales, A, & Surridge, D: Unreliability of nocturnal penile tumescence recording and MMPI profiles in assessment of impotence.Urology, 18:136–139, 1981.
Martinez-Pina, A, Irache, E & Pardell, H: Psychiatric aspects of male impotence.Revista de Pisquiatrea y Psyedogia Medica, 12:357–64, 1976.
Masters, WH & Johnson, V:Human Sexual Inadequacy, Little, Brown and Company: Boston, 1970.
Rucquoy, G: Sexual impotence: Clinical and existential context.Acta Psychiatrica Belgica, 75:74–92, 1975.
Safko, S & Medvecky, J Analysis of functional disorders of sexual potency in men.Ceskoslovenska Psychiatrie, 70:105–08, 1974.
Sexton, RO & Maddock, RC: The treatment of functional impotence with hypnosis and age-regression.J Tenn Med Ass 72:579, 1979.
Surridge, DHC, Condra, M, Morales, A & Fenemore, J: Psychogenic Impotence: New light on its causation and treatment.World J of Urol, 1: 233–38, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reid, K., Surridge, D., Harris, C. et al. The psychological correlates of psychogenic impotence: A retrospective comparison of psychologenically and organically impotent men. Sex Disabil 8, 3–16 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112430
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112430