Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Invasion Pressure to a Ballast-flooded Estuary and an Assessment of Inoculant Survival

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationships between invasion pressure, post-transport inoculant survival, and regional susceptibility to invasion are poorly understood. In marine ecosystems, the movement and release of ballast water from ocean-going ships provides a model system by which to examine the interplay among these factors. One of the largest estuaries in North America, the Chesapeake Bay, receives tremendous amounts of foreign ballast water annually and thus should be at high invasion risk. To date, however, few introductions in Chesapeake Bay have been attributed to ballast release. To understand better the dynamics of this invasion process, we (1) characterized and quantified the biota arriving to Chesapeake Bay in foreign ballast water, (2) compared temperatures and salinities of ballast water and harbor water in upper Chesapeake Bay, and (3) tested experimentally survival of organisms collected from ballast water in temperatures and salinities characteristic of the region. From 1993 to 1994, we sampled planktonic and benthic organisms from 60 foreign vessels arriving to Chesapeake Bay. Our data show that the estuary is being inoculated by a diverse assemblage of aquatic organisms from around the world. Furthermore, the short transit time (≤15 d) for most vessels ensured that substantial numbers of larval and post-larval organisms were being deballasted alive. Most of the ballast water discharged into the upper Chesapeake Bay, however, was significantly higher in salinity (>20‰) than that of the receiving harbor. In laboratory tolerance experiments, ballast water organisms perished under such conditions. Thus, a mismatch in physical conditions between donor and receiver regions may explain the dearth of invasions in the upper Bay. It is likely that the lower Chesapeake Bay, which is more saline, remains at higher risk to ballast water invasion. Recognition of such intraregional differences should allow more focused predictions for monitoring and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpine AE and Cloern JE (1992) Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 37: 946–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RP (1992) Cargo vessel ballast water as a vector for the spread of toxic phytoplankton species to New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 22: 229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz DM and Moyle PB (1993) Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of California stream fishes. Ecological Applications 3: 246–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1985) Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 23: 313–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1989) Man's role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implications for conservation of nearshore environments. Conservation Biology 3: 265–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1992) Dispersal of living organisms into aquatic ecosystems as mediated by aquaculture and fisheries activities. In: Rosenfield A and Mann R (eds) Dispersal of Living Organisms into Aquatic Ecosystems, pp 13–45. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1994) Biological invasions and biodiversity in the sea: the ecological and human impacts of nonindigenous marine and estuarine organisms. Keynote Address. In: Nonindigenous Estuarine and Marine Organisms (NEMO), Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop, Seattle, Washington, April 1993, pp 5–11. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of the Chief Scientist, Government Document No. C55.2:N73, Government Printing Office No. 0208-C-04

  • Carlton JT (1996a) Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78: 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1996b) Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77: 1653–1655

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT and Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: biological invasions and the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT, Thompson JK, Schemel LE and Nichols FH (1990) Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, USA) by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis. I. Introduction and dispersal. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT, Reid DM and van Leeuwen H (1995) Shipping study. The role of shipping in the introduction of non-indigenous aquatic organisms to the coastal waters of the United States (other than the Great Lakes) and an analysis of control options. The National Sea Grant College Program/Connecticut Sea Grant Project R/ES-6. Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC and Groton, Connecticut. Report number CG-D–11–95. Government accession number AD-A294809

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1990) Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87: 9610–9614

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1991) Invasion resistance, species build-up and community collapse in metapopulation models with interspecies competition. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 239–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN and Carlton JT (1995) Biological study: nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and delta. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC and The National Sea Grant College Program Connecticut Sea Grant PB96–166525. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN and Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1989) Chance and timing in biological invasions. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, pp 407–423. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW and Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59: 433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1986) Which animals will invade? In: Mooney HA and Drake JA (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Ecological Studies 58, pp 79–95. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Galil B and Hülsmann N (1997) Protist transport via ballast water — biological classification of ballast tanks by food web interactions. European Journal of Protistology 33: 244–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallegraeff GM and Bolch CJ (1991) Transport of toxic dinoflagellate cysts via ships' ballast water. Marine Pollution Bulletin 22: 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallegraeff GM and Bolch CJ (1992) Transport of diatom and dinoflagellate resting spores in ships' ballast water: implications for plankton biogeography and aquaculture. Journal of Plankton Research 14: 1067–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison GR and Volovik SP (1994) The ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, in the Black Sea: a holoplanktonic organism transported in the ballast water of ships. In: Nonindigenous Estuarine and Marine Organisms (NEMO), Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop, Seattle, Washington, April 1993, pp 25–36. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of the Chief Scientist, Government Document No. C55.2:N73, Government Printing Office No. 0208-C-04

  • Locke A, Reid DM, Sprules WG, Carlton JT and van Leeuwen HC (1991) Effectiveness of mid-ocean exchange in controlling freshwater and coastal zooplankton in ballast water. Canadian Technical Report Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 1822.

  • Locke A, Reid DM, van Leeuwen HC, Sprules WG and Carlton JT (1993) Ballast water exchange as a means of controlling dispersal of freshwater organisms by ships. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 2086–2093

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIsaac HJ (1996) Potential abiotic and biotic impacts of zebra mussels on the inland waters of North America. American Zoologist 36: 287–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie GL and Schloesser DW (1996) Comparative biology of zebra mussels in Europe and North America: an overview. American Zoologist 36: 244–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcof JC (1975) Living marine animals in a ship's ballast water. Proceedings of the National Shellfish Association 65: 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills EL, Leach JH, Carlton JT and Secor CL (1993) Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19: 1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB and Light T (1996) Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols FH, Thompson JK and Schemel LE (1990) Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, USA) by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis. II. Displacement of a former community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Norse EA (ed) (1993) Global Marine Biological Diversity Strategy: Building Conservation into Decision Making. Center for Marine Conservation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress (1993) Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce RW, Carlton JT, Carlton DA and Geller JB (1997) Ballast water as a vector for tintinnid transport. Marine Ecology Progress Series 149: 295–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JV and Edgemon MA (1988) An experimental evaluation of the effect of invasion history on community structure. Ecology 69: 1410–1417

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1986) Predicting invasions and rates of spread. In: Mooney HA and Drake JA (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Ecological Studies 58, pp 179–188. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED and Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37: 621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigel S and Castellan Jr NJ (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1989) Which introductions succeed and which fail? In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, pp 61–75. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LD, Wonham MJ, McCann LD, Reid DM, Ruiz GM and Carlton JT (1996) Shipping study II. Biological invasions by nonindigenous species in United States waters: quantifying the role of ballast water and sediments, parts I and II. The National Sea Grant College Program/Connecticut Sea Grant Project R/ES-6. United States Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard, Washington, DC and Groton, Connecticut. Report number CG-D02–97. Government accession number AD-A321543

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao DV, Sprules WG, Locke A and Carlton JT (1994) Exotic phytoplankton from ships' ballast waters: risk of potential spread to mariculture sites on Canada's east coast. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 937

  • van den Brink FWB, van der Velde G and bij de Vaate A (1993) Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impac of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the Lower Rhine (The Netherlands). Oecologia 93: 224–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A and Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48: 607–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ, Griffiths FB, van der Wal EJ and Kelly J (1988) Cargo vessel ballast water as a vector for the transport of nonindigenous marine species. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 26: 409–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. David Smith

    Present address: Marine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA, 01908, USA

  2. Marjorie J. Wonham

    Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies Program, P.O. Box 6000, Mystic, CT, 06355, USA

    L. David Smith, Marjorie J. Wonham & James T. Carlton

  2. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, MD, 21037, USA

    Linda D. McCann, Gregory M. Ruiz & Anson H. Hines

Authors
  1. L. David Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marjorie J. Wonham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda D. McCann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gregory M. Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anson H. Hines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James T. Carlton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

David Smith, L., Wonham, M.J., McCann, L.D. et al. Invasion Pressure to a Ballast-flooded Estuary and an Assessment of Inoculant Survival. Biological Invasions 1, 67–87 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010094527218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010094527218

Search

Navigation