Skip to main content
Log in

The deep-ocean option for the disposal of sewage sludge

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Present methods of disposal of high-bulk low-toxicity wastes, such as sewage sludge, into shallow marine environments are beginning to be questioned by many environmentalists. The alternative options generally considered all have environmental costs. A novel approach of discharging such wastes as slurries into the deep ocean at depths of 4,000 m close to the abyssal sea bed is considered. Such disposal would fulfil all the criteria required by the Oslo Convention before dumping at sea can be permitted, in that it isolates the waste from Man's ambit and offers no threat to present or foreseeable uses of the ocean. It also seems to fulfil the criteria of the World Conservation Strategy, so long as the oxygen levels in the deep waters of the ocean are not reduced excessively. The improvements in the quality of coastal seas would offset the doubling in the economic cost of disposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel, M.V. and Baker, A. de C. (1982) Vertical distribution of the standing crop of plankton and micronekton at three stations in the North-east Atlantic.Biological Oceanography, 2, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel, M.V. (1986) Vertical migrations in the oceanic realm: Possible causes and probable effects. In Rankin, M.A. (ed.)Migration: Mechanisms and adaptive significance. Contributions in Marine Science, Supplement 27, pp. 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • GESAMP (1980) Monitoring biological variables related to marine pollution.Reports and Studies, 11, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • GESAMP (1982) Scientific criteria for the selection of waste disposal sites at sea.Reports and Studies, 16, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampitt, R.S., Billett, D.S.M. and Rice, A.L. (1986) Biomass of the invertebrate megabenthos from 500 to 4,100 m in the North- east Atlantic Ocean.Marine Biology, 93, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T.H., Gray, J.S. and Johannesen, P.J. (1983) Objective selection of sensitive species indicative of pollution-induced change in benthic communities. 2. Data analyses.Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 12, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1985) Eleventh Report.Managing Waste: The duty of Care. H.M.S.O. London 214pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R.M. (1986) A new model for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities.Marine Biology, 92, 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr Martin V. Angel is the Head of the Biological Oceanography Group at the Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory. He serves on the Council of the WWF, UK and is a member of its Conservation Review Group. He is also a member of the IUCN Commission of Ecology, with particular interests in conservation of oceans and Antarctica. His professional expertise is in the ecology of deep-living pelagic organisms in the oceans but he is also an editor of a research journal,Progress in Oceanography and an external examiner for the Open University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angel, M.V. The deep-ocean option for the disposal of sewage sludge. Environmentalist 8, 19–26 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240308

Keywords

Navigation