Published online Apr 30, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2008.38.4.220
The Effect of Hyperglycemia Induced by Oral Glucose Loading on Coronary Flow Reserve
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Patients with chronic diabetes mellitus (DM) have an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction and mortality. There is some evidence that suggests acute hyperglycemia may cause vascular dysfunction. However, it is unknown whether acute, short-term hyperglycemia affects coronary microcirculation function in healthy subjects. The present study was undertaken to explore this issue.
Subjects and Methods
We evaluated 20 healthy males who had no history of DM or impaired glucose tolerance, ranging in age from 23 to 36 years (25.9±3.3 years). We checked blood sugar, 12-lead electrocardiography, pulse wave velocity, and coronary flow reserve using echocardiography during fasting, and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after ingestion of 75 g of glucose orally.
Results
Non-significant prolongation of the QTc dispersion was observed after the 75 g glucose loading. No significant difference in the pulse wave velocity of the carotid-to-femoral artery, carotid-to-radial artery, or femoral-to-dorsalis pedis artery was observed after the 75 g glucose loading. There was a significant reduction in the coronary flow reserve at 60 (4.06±0.75 vs. 3.54±0.82, p=0.021) and 90 minutes (4.06±0.75 vs. 3.59±0.63, p=0.021) after the 75 g glucose loading compared to that on fasting.
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that acute exposure to high circulating glucose levels does not affect heterogeneity of the ventricular repolarization or arterial stiffness, but it does reduce the coronary flow reserve in healthy young men.
Fig. 1
Coronary flow reserve in a subject with 24 years old. At baseline (A), resting peak diastolic velocity was 16 cm/sec (top) and hyperemic peak diastolic velocity was 86 cm/sec. Calculated coronary flow reserve at baseline was 86/16=5.38; At 60 min after ingestion of 75 g glucose (B), resting peak diastolic velocity was 20 cm/sec (top) and hyperemic peak diastolic velocity was 92 cm/sec. Calculated coronary flow reserve at baseline was 103/22=4.60.
Fig. 2
Changes of coronary flow reserve after ingestion of 75 g glucose. *p<0.05 compare to baseline.
Table 1
Baseline clinical characteristics
Table 2
Changes of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and pulse wave velocity parameters after oral glucose loading
Table 3
Changes of coronary blood flow after oral glucose loading
Table 4
Correlation between change (Δ) of glucose and change of other parameters after 1 hour of oral glucose loading
References
-
DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986.
-
-
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–853.
-
-
Park JH, Kang DH, Lee SW, et al. Detection of coronary restenosis by serial Doppler echocardiographic assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve after percutaneous intervention. Korean Circ J 2004;34:660–669.
-
-
Choi CU, Shim WJ, Kim SH, et al. Factors affecting coronary flow reserve: measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Korean Circ J 2002;32:958–964.
-
-
Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1918;7:353–370.
-
-
Fusimoto K, Hozumi T, Watanabe H, et al. Acute hyperglycemia induced by oral glucose loading suppresses coronary micocirculation on transthoracic doppler echocardiography in healthy young adults. Echocardiography 2006;23:829–834.
-
-
Youn HJ, Park CS, Cho EJ, et al. Analysis of coronary artery flow patterns in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiogram: study using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Korean Circ J 2003;33:205–211.
-
-
Nemes A, Forster T, Csanady M. Decreased aortic distensibility and coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis with normal epicardial coronary arteries. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:567–573.
-