Description: Current estimates of global marine primary production range over a factor of two. At high latitudes, the uncertainty is even larger than globally because here in-situ data and ocean color observations are scarce, and the phytoplankton absorption shows specific characteristics due to the low-light adaptation. The improvement of the primary production estimates requires an accurate knowledge on the chlorophyll vertical profile, which is the basis for most primary production models. To date, studies describing the typical chlorophyll profile based on the chlorophyll in the surface layer did not include the Arctic region or, if it was included, the dependence of the profile shape on surface concentration was neglected. The goal of our study was to derive and describe the typical Greenland Sea chlorophyll profiles, categorized according to the chlorophyll concentration in the surface layer and further monthly resolved. The Greenland Sea was chosen because it is known to be one of the most productive regions of the Arctic and is among the Arctic regions where most chlorophyll field data are available. Our database contained 1199 chlorophyll profiles from R/Vs Polarstern and Maria S Merian cruises combined with data of the ARCSS-PP database (Arctic primary production in-situ database) for the years 1957–2010. The profiles were categorized according to their mean concentration in the surface layer and then monthly median profiles within each category were calculated. The category with the surface layer chlorophyll exceeding 0.7 mg C m−3 showed a clear seasonal cycle with values gradually decreasing from April to August. Chlorophyll profiles maxima moved from lower depths in spring towards the surface in late summer. Profiles with smallest surface values always showed a subsurface chlorophyll maximum with its median magnitude reaching up to three times the surface concentration. While the variability in April, May and June of the Greenland Sea season is following the global non-monthly resolved relationship of the chlorophyll profile to surface chlorophyll concentrations described by the model of Morel and Berthon (1989), it deviates significantly from that in other months (July–September) where the maxima of the chlorophyll are at quite different depths. The Greenland Sea dimensionless monthly median profiles intersect roughly at one common depth within each category. Finally, by applying a Gaussian fitting with 0.1 mg C m−3 surface chlorophyll steps to the median monthly resolved chlorophyll profiles of the defined categories, mathematical approximations have been determined. These will be used as the input to the satellite-based primary production models estimating primary production in Arctic regions.

Description: Sea ice volume and extent currently experience massive reduction in the Arctic Ocean due to climate change. Our long-term study aims at tracing effects of environmental changes in pelagic and benthic systems and investigate accompanying impacts on the fate of organic matter produced in the upper water column on its way down to the seafloor. Since the start of our observations in 1999, we have already seen some effects and will present selected data sets from the upper water column and benthic data during summer expeditions as well as results from vertical particle flux measurements that were obtained from annually deployed sediment traps at the LTER (Long-Term Ecological Research) observatory HAUSGARTEN in the eastern Fram Strait (79°/4°E) and on fewer occasions in the central Arctic Ocean (CAO). Highest biomass was found in the eastern Fram Strait and lowest in the heavily ice-covered regions in the CAO. Flux rates of POC where at least one order of magnitude lower in the CAO than in the eastern Fram Strait. While in the CAO ice algae dominate the recognizable flux fraction, faecal material prevailed in eastern Fram Strait traps. This points towards different systems of organic matter production and modification and, thus, different mechanisms determine the efficiency of the biological carbon pump. These differences are also reflected in the benthic communities in the CAO and in the eastern Fram Strait. These first results have shown the importance of long-term observations and encouraged the continuation of the Arctic Ocean Observing System FRAM (FRontiers in Arctic marine Monitoring) to record environmental and biological data at high temporal and spatial resolution.