GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2000-2004  (9)
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Royal Society of London
    In:  Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B : Biological Sciences, 267 . pp. 1717-1722.
    Publication Date: 2021-06-30
    Description: Northern gannets (Sula bassana) are considered to obtain prey usually by rapid, vertical, shallow plunge dives. In order to test this contention and investigate underwater foraging behaviour, we attached two types of data–logging systems to 11 parental northern gannets at Funk Island in the North–West Atlantic. We documented, for the first time to the authors' knowledge, gannets performing long, flat–bottomed, Ushaped dives that involved underwater wing propulsion as well as rapid, shallow, V–shaped dives. The median and maximum dive depths and durations were 4.6 and 22.0m and 8 and 38s, respectively. Short, shallow dives were usually V–shaped and dives deeper than 8m and longer than 10s were usually Ushaped, including a period at constant depth (varying between 4 and 28s with median 8s). Diving occurred throughout the daylight period and deepest dives were performed during late morning. On the basis of motion sensors in the loggers and food collections from telemetered birds, we concluded that extended, deep dives were directed at deep schools of capelin, a small pelagic fish, and we hypothesized that V–shaped dives were aimed at larger, pelagic fishes and squids. Furthermore, these V–shaped dives allowed the birds to surprise their pelagic prey and this may be critical because the maximum swimming speeds of the prey species may exceed the maximum dive speeds of the birds.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2020-03-18
    Description: The Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) has been reported as declining along its distributional range and has recently been classified as vulnerable. The actual size of the Humboldt Penguin population is still unknown, and a complete population assessment is required. Here we present a study combining both counts of molting birds on land and counts of birds at sea during the molting period. We conducted our study in the Coquimbo Region, Northern Chile, and found 7,619 birds on land and 2,700 at sea, adding up to a total of about 10,300 Humboldt Penguins during the molting season (February 1999). Since these numbers are much higher than all other recent estimates, we emphasize that assessment on land and at sea need to be combined to provide more reliable estimates.
    Type: Article , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  ICES CIEM Newsletter, 38 . pp. 24-25.
    Publication Date: 2020-04-03
    Type: Article , NonPeerReviewed
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Blackwell
    In:  In: The effects of fishing on non-target species and habitats: biological, conservation and socio-economic issues. , ed. by Kaiser, M. J. and de Groot, S. J. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 163-184. ISBN 0-632-05355-0
    Publication Date: 2020-04-17
    Type: Book chapter , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  (Professorial dissertation), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, 43 pp
    Publication Date: 2020-10-08
    Type: Thesis , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Ellert & Richter
    In:  In: Pflanzen- und Tierwelt im Wattenmeer. , ed. by Newig, J. and Theede, H. Ellert & Richter, Hamburg, pp. 100-117.
    Publication Date: 2020-03-05
    Type: Book chapter , PeerReviewed
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  [Paper] In: ICES Annual Science Conference 2001, 23.09.-03.10.2001, Oslo, Norway .
    Publication Date: 2020-04-03
    Description: Five large marine ecosystems are compared in respect to the signatures created by plots of number and average size of species by trophic level. Preliminary results suggest that these signatures are similar for similar ecosystems (here: Baltic Sea and Black Sea as examples of brackish, temperate ecosystems, and Caribbean and South China Sea as examples of tropical ecosystems), and different for different ecosystems (here: temperate vs tropical systems). Also, the shape and the position of the signatures appear to be predictable, as shown for the North Sea, which has a similar shape but intermediate position between the species-poor Baltic and Black Sea, and the species-rich tropical systems. Individual signatures can be interpreted and reveal special characteristics, as shown by the lower part of the Caribbean signature, which has a different trend then the other signatures, indicating that the Caribbean has relatively more herbivorous fishes. Fish data were extracted from www.fishbase.org. Preliminary signatures for cephalopods, marine mammals, and marine birds indicate the different roles of these groups in ecosystems. In the North Sea, vertebrates (fish, birds, marine mammals) and cephalopods are restricted to trophic levels above 3, with the exception of very few fish and bird species). Invertebrates are restricted to trophic levels below 3, again with very few exceptions.
    Type: Conference or Workshop Item , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2019-09-23
    Description: We examined how seabirds might be used to study marine environmental variables, which necessitates knowing location and the value of the variable to be studied. Five systems can potentially be used for determination of location: VHF (Very High Frequency) telemetry, PTT (Platform Terminal Transmitters) telemetry, GLS (Global Location Service) geolocation methods, dead reckoning and GPS (Global Positioning System), each with its own advantages with respect to accuracy, potential number of fixes and size. Temperature and light were used to illustrate potential difficulties in recording environmental variables. Systems currently used on seabirds for measurement of temperature respond slowly to environmental changes; thus, they may not measure sea surface temperature adequately when contact periods with water bodies are too short. Light can be easily measured for light extinction studies, but sensor orientation plays a large role in determining recorded values. Both problems can be corrected. The foraging behaviour of seabirds was also examined in order to identify those features which would be useful for determination of marine environmental variables at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. Area coverage by birds is highly dependent on breeding phase and tends to be concentrated in areas where prey acquisition is particularly enhanced. The identification of these sites may be of particular interest to marine biologists. 'Plungers' and 'divers' are potentially most useful for assessment of variables deeper within the water column, with some divers spending up to 90% of their time sub-surface. Few seabirds exploit the water column deeper than 20 m, although some divers regularly exceed 50 m (primarily penguins and auks), while 2 species dive in excess of 300 m. The wide-ranging behaviour of seabirds coupled, in many instances, with their substantial body size makes them potentially excellent carriers of sophisticated environmental measuring technology; however, the ethical question of how much the well-being of birds can, and should, be compromised by such an approach needs to be carefully considered.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Oxford Univ. Press
    In:  ICES Journal of Marine Science (57). pp. 531-547.
    Publication Date: 2019-09-23
    Description: Birds are the most conspicuous, wide-ranging, and easily studied organisms in the marine environment. They can be both predators and scavengers, and they can be harmed by and can benefit from fishing activities. The effects of fishing on birds may be direct or indirect. Most direct effects involve killing by fishing gear, although on a lesser scale some fishing activities also disturb birds. Net fisheries and hook fisheries have both had serious negative effects at the population level. Currently, a major negative impact comes from the by-catch of albatrosses and petrels in long-lines in the North Pacific and in the Southern Ocean. High seas drift nets have had, prior to the banning of their use, a considerable impact on seabirds in the northern Pacific, as have gillnets in south-west Greenland, eastern Canada, and elsewhere. Indirect effects mostly work through the alteration in food supplies. Many activities increase the food supply by providing large quantities of discarded fish and wastes, particularly those from large, demersal species that are inaccessible to seabirds, from fishing vessels to scavengers. Also, fishing has changed the structure of marine communities. Fishing activities have led to depletion of some fish species fed upon by seabirds, but may also lead to an increase in small fish prey by reducing numbers of larger fish that may compete with birds. Both direct and indirect effects are likely to have operated at the global population level on some species. Proving the scale of fisheries effects can be difficult because of confounding and interacting combinations with other anthropogenic effects (pollution, hunting, disturbance) and oceanographic factors. Effects of aquaculture have not been included in the review
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...