In:
Journal of Animal Science, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 100, No. Supplement_3 ( 2022-09-22), p. 153-153
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between beef heifer feed efficiency and subsequent greenhouse gas emissions using an unprocessed hay diet. Fifty-four Angus and Angus Herford cross heifers were subject to a 71-day hay intake test using individual intake technology (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) with a stocking rate of 3.6 heifers per feeder. Heifers were blocked by BW into 2 drylot pens (HEAVY, n=21; LIGHT, n=33) at the Oklahoma State University Range Cow Research Center located near Stillwater, OK. Throughout the study, heifers were fed a long-stem, unprocessed, grass hay diet (10.8% CP, 2.0 Mcal ME, and 56% TDN) with 21-d adaptation. A subset of 39 heifers were used for the collection of gas flux data using an open-circuit, portable, gas-quantification system (GreenFeed, C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) to measure (means±SD) oxygen consumption (3,118±330.9 g/d), carbon dioxide production (4,664±467.9 g/d), and methane production (169±23.4 g/d). Phenotypic measures (means±SD) for dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), average body weight (BW), and residual feed intake (RFI) were 6.75±1.12 kg, 0.15±0.2 kg, 312.7±30.5 kg, and 0.08±0.84 kg, respectively. Predicted DMI was calculated using a multiple regression equation (-3.11 + 0.13*BW0.75+0.76*ADG; P & lt; 0.05; R2=0.43) in R. To further evaluate forage efficiency, heifers were segregated by 0.5 SD into three RFI categories of efficient (n=13), average (n=31), and inefficient (n=10) resulting in means of 5.8, 6.76, and 7.94 kg DMI and 0.16, 0.16, and 0.15 kg ADG, respectively. There was no significant difference (p & lt; 0.05) between RFI categories for ADG, CO2, CH4, and O2. Phenotypic correlations of DMI with CO2, CH4, and O2 were 0.59, 0.45, and 0.61, respectively. Efficient heifers consumed 21% less forage compared with inefficient heifers, suggesting that improvement in forage utilization can be achieved when efficiency is evaluated using an unprocessed grass hay diet.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0021-8812
,
1525-3163
DOI:
10.1093/jas/skac247.284
Language:
English
Publisher:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1490550-4
SSG:
12
Permalink