GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: SSRN Electronic Journal, Elsevier BV
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1556-5068
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e15053-e15053
    Abstract: e15053 Background: Among recently developed blood-based MCED tests, the ability to determine the location of tumors is pivotal to guiding appropriate treatment. We systematically reviewed and statistically examined the accuracy of tumor of origin predictions among blood-based MCED tests. Methods: Original articles were searched from Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase for blood-based screening tests, multiple cancer types, and asymptomatic human subjects. We excluded studies with small samples (n 〈 30), non-screening, and non-blood-based tests. For cfDNA-based assays, measurements of diagnostic accuracy were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Of 1,074 records identified and screened, five case-control studies and one cohort study that used cfDNA-based diagnostic tests were analyzed. Accuracy of tissue-of-origin (TOO) prediction for 3,895 cancer samples across cancer types was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66 - 0.90). Among six cancer types, colorectal cancers had the highest accuracy and liver & bile duct cancers had the lowest, although the difference was statistically insignificant (0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) vs. 0.68 (95% CI 0.40-0.90)). Additionally, cases were most frequently misclassified as colorectal cancer (Table 1). The information for localizing TOO was derived from methylation patterns of cfDNA in four studies, fragmentation profiles of cfDNA in another study, and combination of mutations in cfDNA and protein markers in the last study. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the primary site of cancers was accurately discerned in 79% of cases by MCED tests. However, performance varies across cancer types. Further research on performance based on cancer stages and in combination with other molecular profiling is warranted. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Clinical Lung Cancer, Elsevier BV, ( 2024-3)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1525-7304
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193644-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e21217-e21217
    Abstract: e21217 Background: Radiomics can predict diagnosis, metastasis, actionable mutations and treatment response in NSCLC patients by analyzing the heterogeneity of tumors and its surrounding tissues from medical images. In this abstract, machine-learning models based on radiomic features, in patients with NSCLC, were established and evaluated. Methods: Patients with NSCLC and treated with ICIs were selected. Main tumor and peri-tumoral space were segmented on chest CT scans with contrast at the start of immunotherapy by four clinicians. Among 255 radiomic features were extracted using LIFEx software (IMIV/CEA, Orsay, France), the top 30 features with the highest Fleiss’ kappa coefficient were chosen. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm with mixed effects was utilized to develop models. We divided data into two groups as a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) and conducted bootstrapping to evaluate the efficiency of the models. The performance of the models was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV). Durable disease control, progression, clinical progression, EGFR mutations, bone metastasis was evaluated by each model. Durable disease control was defined as no progression of diseases for 24 weeks or more after initiation of ICIs according to RECIST 1.1. Progression was defined by RECIST 1.1 on the first follow-up CT. Clinical progression was defined when treatment was discontinued due to disease progression. Results: Total 102 patients were analyzed; 55 (53.9%) were female and 47 (46.1%) were male. The mean age at the start of ICI treatment was 65.6 [range: 22-89] . The multi-reader radiomics-based models predicts durable disease control, progression, clinical progression, EGFR mutation, and bone metastasis with a sensitivity of 0.700, 0.714, 0.286, 0.909, and 0.810, and specificity of 0.417, 0.444, 0.778, 0.200, and 0.222 respectively. The statistical values of the models are shown in the Table. Conclusions: The machine-learning models grounded on radiomics features has limited accuracy to prognosticate ICIs treatment outcome, EGFR mutations, and distant bone metastasis. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3069-3069
    Abstract: 3069 Background: Globally, cancer results in 10.08 million deaths per year. A single blood-based screening tool that detects multiple cancer types could significantly reduce cancer burden. We systematically reviewed and statistically examined both the accuracy and applicability of blood-based MCED tests to strategize their utilization in improving cancer detection. Methods: Original articles were searched from PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase for blood-based screening tests analyzing multiple cancer types and asymptomatic human subjects. We excluded studies with small sample sizes (n 〈 30), hypothesis-generating/diagnostic tests, and non-blood-based tests. For cfDNA-based assays, measurements of diagnostic accuracy were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Of 1,074 records identified and screened, 15 case-control and 4 cohort studies were analyzed, most of which utilized cfDNA-based diagnostic tests. Twelve cfDNA studies selected for meta-analysis had pooled sensitivity of 0.623 (95%CI 0.517 - 0.719) and specificity of 0.975 (0.942 - 0.990). Summary ROC curve shows variability in sensitivity and specificity between studies. However, sensitivity and specificity were not affected by study type, gender, or assay type. Sensitivity was higher for advanced staged cancers (III/IV 0.774 (0.697 - 0.837)) than early-stage cancers (I/II 0.503 (0.366 - 0.639)). Among cancer types, no significant differences were detected. Lastly, false positive and false negative rates were 0.025 (0.010 - 0.058) and 0.447 (0.438 - 0.456), respectively. Conclusions: Given high sensitivities and specificities, MCED tests show promise as additional screening tools. However, in the general population, misdiagnosis burden from false positive and negative rates is anticipated. Although multiple barriers exist to their application in the clinic, MCED tests may improve patient outcomes for cancers with no conventional screening tools and provide additional credibility when combined with existing tools. Future prospective studies with large and diverse populations are warranted. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 7_Supplement ( 2023-04-04), p. 784-784
    Abstract: Background: Among the recently developed blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests, determining the location of tumors is pivotal to guiding appropriate treatment. We aim to systematically review and statistically examine the accuracy of tumor of origin prediction among blood-based MCED tests. Methods: Original articles were searched from Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase that featured blood-based screening tests, multiple cancer types, and asymptomatic human subjects. We excluded studies with small samples (n & lt;30), non-screening tests, and non-blood-based tests. For cell-free DNA (cfDNA) based assays, measurements of diagnostic accuracy were pooled for meta-analysis. Findings: Of 1,074 records identified and screened, 4 cohort studies were analyzed using cfDNA-based diagnostic tests. The accuracy of tissue-of-origin (TOO) prediction for 3,762 cancer samples across cancer types was 0.79 (95% CI 0.64 - 0.91). Among six cancer types, colorectal cancers had the highest accuracy, and liver & bile duct cancers had the lowest, although the difference was statistically insignificant (0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) vs. 0.68 (95% CI 0.40-0.90)). Additionally, cases were most frequently misclassified as colorectal cancer (Table 1). Lastly, two studies reported increased prediction accuracies when two sites of origin were assigned rather than a single site. The information for localizing TOO was derived from methylation patterns of cfDNA in two studies, fragmentation profiles of cfDNA in another study, and protein markers in the other research. Interpretation: Our results demonstrate that the primary site of cancers was accurately discerned in 79% of cases by MCED tests. However, the performance varies across cancer types. Further research on performance according to cancer stages and in combination with other molecular profiling is warranted. Table 1. Events/Total Accuracy of prediction (95% CI) misclassification type freqeuncy Total 3,129/3,762 0.79 (0.64 - 0.91) Colorectal 638/723 0.89 (0.79 - 0.97) stomach & esophagus 26/553 breast 8/553 Breast 443/538 0.86 (0.64 - 0.99) colorectal 20/349 pancreas & GB 4/349 lung 4/349 Ovarian Breast 132/159 0.85 (0.62 - 0.99) colorectal 39/261 uterus 13/147 Pancreatic & GB 289/338 0.82 (0.69 - 0.93) colorectal 12/300 stomach & esophagus 10/300 Stomach & Esophagus 225/311 0.75 (0.48 - 0.95) colorectal 39/261 lung 10/261 Lung 530/656 0.72 (0.45 - 0.92) colorectal 29/560 head and neck 8/560 Liver & Bile duct 95/144 0.68 (0.40 - 0.90) colorectal 13/220 pancreatic & GB 8/220 Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GB = gallbladder Citation Format: Youjin Oh, Joo Hee Park, Liam Il-Young Chung, Richard Duan, Trie Arni Djunadi, Sung Mi Yoon, Zunairah Shah, Chan Mi Jung, Ilene Hong, Leeseul Kim, Horyun Choi, Young Kwang Chae. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of tumor origin detection in blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) in the general population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 784.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 83, No. 7_Supplement ( 2023-04-04), p. 5619-5619
    Abstract: Background: Radiomics is an emerging tool that involves the extraction of high-throughput features from medical images. These quantitative values can be used to develop predictive models for clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. We evaluated radiomic features-based models as imaging biomarkers in NSCLC patients. Methods: 71 patients with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy who had pretreatment CT chest with contrast were retrospectively evaluated. The main tumor and 1cm-thick peritumoral space surrounding the tumor were manually segmented using LIFEx software (IMIV/CEA, Orsay, France) by four physicians. Of 255 radiomic features collected, those with & gt;0.4 of Fleiss’ kappa coefficient were selected. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm with mixed effects was used to develop multi-reader models and assess feature importance. The dataset was divided into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%). Bootstrapping with 1,000 iterations was conducted to estimate the model performance. Durable disease control was defined as having no progression of diseases per RECIST 1.1 up to 24 weeks from starting immunotherapy. Results: Among 71 patients, 35 (49.3%) are female and 36 (50.7%) are male. The median age was 66. 48 (67.6%) adenocarcinoma, 13 (18.3%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 10 (14.1%) other histologic types were included. 22 radiomic features were included based on importance in the prediction models from both the tumor and peritumoral space. Each model is trained to predict patients’ durable disease control, TTF1 expression, PD-L1 expression, histology (adenocarcinoma or not), and Neutrophils Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR; greater than 5 or not) status. The statistical results from the models to predict clinical outcomes are shown in Table. Conclusion: The radiomic features-based models lack accuracy in predicting clinical characteristics and outcomes. Further validation with larger cohorts is warranted. Statistics of radiomics-based models in predicting clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes Durable Disease Control(Yes/No)(n=64) TTF1 expression(Yes/No)(n=62) Histology(Adeno/Other)(n=71) NLR( & gt;=5/ & lt;5)(n=71) PD-L1 expression(Yes/No)(n=52) Patient Number(%) 33 (51.56%)/31 (48.44%) 37 (59.68%)/25 (40.32%) 48 (67.61%)/23 (32.39%) 28 (39.44%)/43 (60.56%) 35 (67.31%)/17 (32.69%) Sensitivity (95% CI) 0.63 (0.58, 0.72) 0.62 (0.56, 0.74) 0.69 (0.56, 0.82) 0.55 (0.47, 0.61) 0.57 (0.48, 0.65) Specificity (95% CI) 0.46 (0.37, 0.52) 0.68 (0.58, 0.76) 0.22 (0.12, 0.34) 0.60 (0.56, 0.68) 0.36 (0.30, 0.45) Positive Predictive Value(95% CI) 0.52 (0.49, 0.57) 0.44(0.37, 0.60) 0.62 (0.59, 0.64) 0.69 (0.67, 0.74) 0.72 (0.68, 0.77) Negative Predictive Value(95% CI) 0.58 (0.54, 0.63) 0.79 (0.74, 0.88) 0.28 (0.22, 0.32) 0.46 (0.39, 0.51) 0.25 (0.21, 0.28) Citation Format: Jisang Yu, Yury Velichko, Hyeonseon Kim, Moataz Soliman, Nicolo Gennnaro, Leeseul Kim, Youjin Oh, Trie Arni Djunadi, Jeeyeon Lee, Liam Il-Young Chung, Sungmi Yoon, Zunairah Shah, Soowon Lee, Cecilia Nam, Timothy Hong, Rishi Agrawal, Pascale Aouad, Young Kwang Chae. Radiomics-based machine learning models to predict progression and biomarker status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5619.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...