GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 5 ( 2020-03-01), p. 1017-1024
    Abstract: To determine whether second-line therapy with capecitabine and temozolomide was superior to irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) in patients with RAS-mutated, methyl-guanine methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: In this randomized, phase II trial, we enrolled patients with RAS-mutated, MGMT-methylated mCRC after failure of oxaliplatin-based regimen. Patients with centrally confirmed MGMT methylation were stratified by first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and prior bevacizumab and randomized to either capecitabine plus temozolomide (arm A, CAPTEM) or FOLFIRI (arm B). The primary endpoint was PFS analyzed on intention-to-treat basis, with 90% power and one-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect an increase of median time from 2 months in arm B to 4 months in arm A. Results: Between November 2014 and May 2019, 86 patients were randomly assigned to arm A (n = 43) or arm B (n = 43). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months (interquartile range, 12.2–36.3), 79 disease progression or death events occurred. Superiority of arm A was not demonstrated (one-sided P = 0.223). Progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (2.0–5.0) and 9.5 (8.2–25.8) in arm A versus 3.5 (2.3–6.1) and 10.6 (8.5–20.8) in arm B [HR = 1.19 (0.82–1.72) and HR = 0.97 (0.58–1.61)], respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events had higher incidence in arm B versus A (47.6% vs 16.3%), and quality of life was significantly worse in arm B. Patients with positive MGMT expression by IHC did not benefit from CAPTEM. Conclusions: Temozolomide-based therapy warrants further investigation in molecularly hyperselected subgroups.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Brain and Behavior, Wiley, Vol. 9, No. 5 ( 2019-05)
    Abstract: Moyamoya disease (MMD) meaning “hazy puff of smoke” in Japanese is a rare chronic cerebrovascular syndrome characterized by progressive stenosis and occlusion of the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs), and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). Methods Our moyamoya patient with severely impaired cognitive and motor functions underwent a specific motor and neuropsychological rehabilitative treatments to assess the recovery of consciousness. Results Results obtained showed an improvement of clinical and neuropsychological examination. These findings highlighted the importance of an intensive rehabilitation techniques used in the care of disorders of consciousness patients. Conclusions The use of sensory methods provides advantages for the rehabilitation. In fact, in this study, we showed a correlation between sensory stimulation and changes in patient's clinical status.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2162-3279 , 2162-3279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2623587-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 33 ( 2019-11-20), p. 3099-3110
    Abstract: We assessed the prognostic/predictive role of primary tumor sidedness and uncommon alterations of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) primary resistance (primary resistance in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies [PRESSING] panel) in patients with RAS/ BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were randomly assigned to panitumumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) induction followed by maintenance with panitumumab with or without fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV); Valentino trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02476045 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS This prespecified retrospective analysis included 199 evaluable patients with RAS/ BRAF wt. The PRESSING panel included the following: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization for HER2/MET amplification, IHC with or without RNA sequencing for ALK/ROS1/NTRKs/RET fusions, next-generation sequencing for HER2/ PIK3CAex.20/PTEN/ AKT1 and RAS mutations with low mutant allele fraction, and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for microsatellite instability. PRESSING status (any positive biomarker v all negative) and sidedness were correlated with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the study population and by treatment arm. RESULTS Overall, left- and right-sided tumors were 85.4% and 14.6%, respectively, and PRESSING-negative and -positive tumors were 75.4% and 24.6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 26 months, inferior outcomes were consistently observed in right- versus left-sided tumors for ORR (55.2% v 74.1%; P = .037), PFS (8.4 v 11.5 months; P = .026), and OS (2-year rate: 50.2% v 65.1%; P = .062). Similar results were observed in the PRESSING-positive versus PRESSING-negative subgroup for ORR (59.2% v 75.3%; P = .030), PFS (7.7 v 12.1 months; P 〈 .001), and OS (2-year rate: 48.1% v 68.1%; P = .021). The PFS benefit of FU plus LV added to panitumumab maintenance, reported in the study, was independent from sidedness and PRESSING status (interaction for PFS P = .293 and .127, respectively). However, outcomes were extremely poor in patients who received single-agent panitumumab and had right-sided tumors (median PFS, 7.7 months; 2-year OS, 38.5%) or PRESSING-positive tumors (median PFS, 7.4 months; 2-year OS, 47.0%). CONCLUSION The combined assessment of sidedness and molecular alterations of anti-EGFR primary resistance identified a consistent proportion of patients with RAS/ BRAF–wt mCRC who had inferior benefit from initial anti-EGFR–based regimens, particularly after maintenance with single-agent anti-EGFRs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 9 ( 2021-05-01), p. 2505-2514
    Abstract: The routine use of liquid biopsy is not recommended for the choice of initial treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Experimental Design: We included patients with left-sided, RAS/BRAF wild-type, HER2-negative, and microsatellite stable mCRC, treated with upfront panitumumab/FOLFOX-4 in the Valentino study. We performed amplicon-based genomic profiling of 14 genes in baseline plasma samples and compared these data with tumor tissue ultra-deep sequencing results. Specific gene mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their clonality were associated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiological dynamics. Results: Ten and 15 of 120 patients had a mutation of RAS and PIK3CA in ctDNA, with a positive concordance with tissue deep sequencing of only 31.3% and 47.1%, respectively. Presence of RAS or PIK3CA mutations in baseline ctDNA was associated with worse median PFS [8 vs. 12.8 months; HR, 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28–4.81; P = 0.007 and 8.5 vs. 12.9 months; HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.63–5.04; P & lt; 0.001] and median OS (17.1 vs. 36.5 months; HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.03–4.96; P = 0.042 and 21.1 vs. 38.9 months; HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.16–4.07; P = 0.015). RAS mutations in ctDNA were associated with worse RECIST response, early tumor shrinkage, and depth of response, while PIK3CA mutations were not. Patients with higher levels of RAS/PIK3CA variant allele fraction (VAF) in ctDNA had the worst outcomes (VAF ≥ 5% vs. all wild-type: median PFS, 7.7 vs. 13.1 months; HR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.03–7.95; P & lt; 0.001 and median OS, 18.8 vs. 38.9 months; HR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.04–8.12; P & lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Baseline ctDNA profiling may add value to tumor tissue testing to refine the molecular hyperselection of patients with mCRC for upfront anti-EGFR–based strategies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Religion and Health, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 58, No. 4 ( 2019-8), p. 1444-1452
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-4197 , 1573-6571
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2017250-3
    SSG: 0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 78, No. 13_Supplement ( 2018-07-01), p. CT095-CT095
    Abstract: Backgroud Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pts bearing promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), are suitable for treatment with temozolomide (TMZ) with an expected response rate up to 10% even in the chemorefractory setting. Additionally, the reintroduction of a previously used chemoterapeutic agent with potentially retained sensitivity is often used. We hypothesized that the combination of irinotecan, another DNA damaging agent, and TMZ (TEMIRI regimen) in pts with irinotecan-sensitive, MGMT methylated, microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC may be a novel treatment approach. Methods Pts with mCRC bearing MGMT methylation were identified in two Italian institutions. Key inclusions criteria were: MSS mCRC, progression after at least two prior chemotherapy lines for advanced disease, irinotecan free interval (IFI) ≥ 3 months, as defined by the time elapsed from the last irinotecan-based regimen and the time of progressive disease. MGMT promoter methylation and MSS status were confirmed centrally. Eligible pts received a maximum of 6 cycles of TEMIRI regimen (TMZ 150mg/sqm on days 1-5 plus irinotecan 100mg/sqm on days1,15 every 28 days) followed by maintenance with single-agent TMZ until progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint of the study was overall response rate (ORR). Setting p0 = 10%, and p1 = 35%, with 1-sided-α and β errors of 0.05 and 0.20, 25 patients were required. Null hypothesis would have been rejected if RECIST response had been observed in at least 6 patients. Exploratory endpoints included the correlation of activity/efficacy parameters with biomarkers, including MGMT immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MethylBEAMing (MB). Results Twenty-five pts were enrolled between December 2014 and June 2017. Seventeen pts (68%) had extensive metastatic disease. The majority of pts was heavily pretreated: 68% received more than 3 lines of therapy. Median IFI was 6.8 months. The primary endpoint was met: partial responses (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 were detected in six out of 25 patients (ORR 24%, 95% CI, 11%-43%). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were of 4.4 and 13.8 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated with neutropenia being the most common G3-G4 adverse event (8%) followed by diarrhea (4%). MGMT IHC had a negative predictive value of 100% as all pts whose cancer was MGMT-positive were non-responders. Additionally, pts with MGMT-negative/low tumors had a significantly longer mPFS than those with MGMT-positive ones (6.9 versus 2.0 months; HR=0.29, 95%CI, 0.02-0.41; p=0.003) while no significant difference in OS was observed (17.3 versus 13.8 months; HR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.13-1.85; p=0.303). Similarly, patients with methylation percentage ≥63 by MB had a significantly longer mPFS than others (6.6 versus 3.8 months; HR=0.46, 95% CI, 0.13-0.95; p=0.049), with no OS differences (15.5 versus 12.7 months; HR=0.75, 95% CI 0.24-2.11; p=0.327). Conclusions Given the disappointing results of the available treatments in the chemorefractory setting, TEMIRI regimen is a safe and promising approach for pretreated MGMT-methylated, MSS mCRC pts Citation Format: Federica Morano, Salvatore Corallo, Ludovic Barault, Monica Niger, Rosa Berenato, Roberto Moretto, Giovanni Fucà, Giovanni Randon, Maria Antista, Antonino Belfiore, Alessandra Raimondi, Federico Nichetti, Francesca Vita, Federica Perrone, Massimo Milione, Giancarlo Pruneri, Alfredo Falcone, Maria Di Bartolomeo, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Filippo De Braud, Chiara Cremolini, Filippo Pietrantonio. Temozolomide and irinotecan (TEMIRI regimen) as salvage treatment of irinotecan-sensitive advanced colorectal cancer patients (pts) bearing MGMT methylation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT095.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: BMC Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2020-12)
    Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reported remarkable achievements in several solid tumours. However, in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) promising results are limited to patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-high) tumours due to their immune-enriched microenvironment. Combining cytotoxic agents and bevacizumab in mCRC with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stability (pMMR/MSS) could make ICIs efficacious by increasing the exposure of neoantigens, especially with highly active chemotherapy regimens, inducing immunogenic cell death, increasing the tumoral infiltration of CD8+ T-cells and reducing tumour-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells. VEGF-blockade also plays an immunomodulatory role by inhibiting the expansion of T regulatory lymphocytes. Consistently with this rationale, a phase Ib study combined the anti-PDL-1 atezolizumab with FOLFOX/bevacizumab as first-line treatment of mCRC, irrespective of microsatellite status, and reported interesting activity and efficacy results, without safety concerns. Phase III trials led to identify FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as an upfront therapeutic option in selected mCRC patients. Drawing from these considerations, the combination of atezolizumab with an intensified upfront treatment (FOLFOXIRI) and bevacizumab could be worthy of investigation. Methods AtezoTRIBE is a prospective, open label, phase II, comparative trial in which initially unresectable and previously untreated mCRC patients, irrespective of microsatellite status, are randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receive up to 8 cycles of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab plus 5-fluoruracil/leucovorin with or without atezolizumab according to treatment arm until disease progression. The primary endpoint is PFS. Assuming a median PFS of 12 months for standard arm, 201 patients should be randomized in a 1:2 ratio to detect a hazard ratio of 0.66 in favour of the experimental arm. A safety run-in phase including the first 6 patients enrolled in the FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab/atezolizumab arm was planned, and no unexpected adverse events or severe toxicities were highlighted by the Safety Monitoring Committee. Discussion The AtezoTRIBE study aims at assessing whether the addition of atezolizumab to an intensified chemotherapy plus bevacizumab might be an efficacious upfront strategy for the treatment of mCRC, irrespective of the microsatellite status. Trial registration AtezoTRIBE is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03721653 ), October 26th, 2018 and at EUDRACT (2017–000977-35), Februray 28th, 2017 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1471-2407
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041352-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: British Journal of Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 123, No. 3 ( 2020-08-04), p. 403-409
    Abstract: Immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) showed a prognostic relevance in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We aimed at evaluating the prognostic power of a new comprehensive biomarker, the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV), in patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy. Methods In the present pooled-analysis, we included patients enrolled in the Valentino and TRIBE trials. PIV was calculated as: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. A cut-off was determined using the maximally selected rank statistics method. Generalised boosted regression (GBR), the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. Results A total of 438 patients were included. Overall, 208 patients (47%) had a low-baseline PIV and 230 (53%) had a high-baseline PIV. Patients with high PIV experienced a worse PFS (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.36–2.03, P   〈  0.001) and worse OS (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.57–2.57; P   〈  0.001) compared to patients with low PIV. PIV outperformed the other IIBs in the GBR model and in the multivariable models. Conclusion PIV is a strong predictor of survival outcomes with better performance than other well-known IIBs in patients with mCRC treated with first-line therapy. PIV should be prospectively validated to better stratify mCRC patients undergoing first-line therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-0920 , 1532-1827
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002452-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80075-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 135 ( 2020-08), p. 78-88
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: The Oncologist, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 26, No. 4 ( 2021-04-01), p. 302-309
    Abstract: Doublets plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are the preferred upfront option for patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab is superior to doublets plus bevacizumab independently from primary tumor sidedness and RAS/BRAF status. No randomized comparison between FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab versus doublets plus anti-EGFRs is available in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Materials and Methods We selected patients with left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab or FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab in five randomized trials: Valentino, TRIBE, TRIBE2, STEAM, and CHARTA. A propensity score-based analysis was performed to compare FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab with FOLFOX-panitumumab. Results A total of 185 patients received FOLFOX-panitumumab and 132 received FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 13.3 and 33.1 months in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group compared with 11.4 and 30.3 months in the FOLFOX-panitumumab group (propensity score-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PFS, 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64–1.04; p = .11; propensity score-adjusted HR for OS, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59–1.08; p = .14). No significant differences in overall response rate and disease control rate were observed. A statistically nonsignificant difference in favor of FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab was observed for OS after secondary resection of metastases. Chemotherapy-related adverse events were more frequent in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group, with specific regard to grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (48% vs. 26%, adjusted p = .001). Conclusion Although randomized comparison is lacking, both FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab and FOLFOX-panitumumab are valuable treatment options in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Implications for Practice A propensity score-based analysis of five trials was performed to compare FOLFOX-panitumumab versus FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). No significant differences were observed, but FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab achieved numerically superior survival outcomes versus FOLFOX-panitumumab. Chemotherapy-related adverse events were more frequent in the FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab group. These observations suggest that although doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFRs remains the preferred treatment in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC, FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab is a valuable option able to provide similar, if not better, outcomes at the price of a moderate increase in toxicity and may be adopted based on patients’ preference and potential impact on quality of life.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-7159 , 1549-490X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2023829-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...