Abstract: Molecular risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is largely based on genetic markers. However, epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation, deregulate gene expression and may also have prognostic impact. We evaluated the clinical relevance of integrating DNA methylation and genetic information in AML. Methods Next-generation sequencing analysis of methylated DNA identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with prognostic mutations in older (≥ 60 years) cytogenetically normal (CN) patients with AML (n = 134). Genes with promoter DMRs and expression levels significantly associated with outcome were used to compute a prognostic gene expression weighted summary score that was tested and validated in four independent patient sets (n = 355). Results In the training set, we identified seven genes (CD34, RHOC, SCRN1, F2RL1, FAM92A1, MIR155HG, and VWA8) with promoter DMRs and expression associated with overall survival (OS; P ≤ .001). Each gene had high DMR methylation and lower expression, which were associated with better outcome. A weighted summary expression score of the seven gene expression levels was computed. A low score was associated with a higher complete remission (CR) rate and longer disease-free survival and OS (P 〈 .001 for all end points). This was validated in multivariable models and in two younger ( 〈 60 years) and two older independent sets of patients with CN-AML. Considering the seven genes individually, the fewer the genes with high expression, the better the outcome. Younger and older patients with no genes or one gene with high expression had the best outcomes (CR rate, 94% and 87%, respectively; 3-year OS, 80% and 42%, respectively). Conclusion A seven-gene score encompassing epigenetic and genetic prognostic information identifies novel AML subsets that are meaningful for treatment guidance.

Abstract: Autoimmune disease (AD) can manifest uncommonly either at the time of diagnosis of MDS or during its course. When present, AD generally responds to immunosuppressive therapies, but cytopenias and immunosuppression associated with MDS compromise delivery of these therapies. Few studies have investigated the impact of co-existing AD on the course and outcome of patients with MDS. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical manifestations, laboratory characteristics, response to therapy and survival of MDS patients with AD. Records of patients evaluated at Roswell Park Cancer Institute with pathologically demonstrated MDS between 1993 and 2003 (n=277) were reviewed and patients with evidence of AD were identified. Patients with laboratory abnormalities without disease manifestations were excluded, as were patients with therapy-related MDS following treatment for AD. 13 patients (4%) were identified with co-existing MDS and AD. The initial presentation was AD in 6 (46%) and MDS in 4 (31%), while 3 patients (23%) had near-simultaneous diagnoses of both conditions. The spectrum of AD in these patients included systemic vasculitis in 3 patients, systemic lupus erythematosus in two and rheumatoid arthritis, temporal arteritis, cryoglobulinemia, aphthous stomatitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, inflammatory bowel disease, erythema nodosum and Evans syndrome in one patient each. Anti-double stranded DNA (levels ≥ 40.0 u/ml; normal range 0.0–3.5u/ml), ANA (≥1:160), cold agglutinins, low C3 and elevated ESR (≥100mm/hr) were the serological abnormalities detected at the time of AD diagnosis. Eleven of 13 patients were female, and median age at diagnosis of MDS was 65 years, while the entire cohort was 44% female (p=0.005) and had a median age of 71 yrs at diagnosis. FAB subtypes were RA (n=7), RAEB (n=3), CMMoL (n=2) and RARS (n=1). Cytogenetics were normal in 5 patients; abnormalities in the other 8 patients included −7, +8, and del(5q). The median survival of patients from diagnosis of MDS was 48 months and the survival from diagnosis of AD was 46 months. Known causes of death in 6 patients included sepsis, intracranial hemorrhage, lung cancer and transplant-associated multiorgan failure. Based on this study, AD occurs in 4% of MDS patients, predominantly affects female patients, and has heterogeneous clinical manifestations.The pathobiologic implication of the occurrence of AD at the same time or after the diagnosis of MDS is that the dysplastic clone might be responsible for the induction of immune dysregulation.

Abstract: Yacoub et al report excellent responses to pegylated interferon alfa-2a in patients with hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia.

Abstract: The receptor tyrosine kinase fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), involved in regulating survival, proliferation, and differentiation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, is expressed on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells in most patients. Mutations of FLT3 resulting in constitutive signaling are common in AML, including internal tandem duplication (ITD) in the juxtamembrane domain in 25% of patients and point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain in 5%. Patients with AML with FLT3-ITD have a high relapse rate and short relapse-free and overall survival after chemotherapy and after transplant. A number of inhibitors of FLT3 signaling have been identified and are in clinical trials, both alone and with chemotherapy, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes in patients with AML with FLT3 mutations. While inhibitor monotherapy produces clinical responses, they are usually incomplete and transient, and resistance develops rapidly. Diverse combination therapies have been suggested to potentiate the efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors and to prevent development of resistance or overcome resistance. Combinations with epigenetic therapies, proteasome inhibitors, downstream kinase inhibitors, phosphatase activators, and other drugs that alter signaling are being explored. This review summarizes the current status of translational and clinical research on FLT3 inhibitors in AML, and discusses novel combination approaches. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(6); 991–1001. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract: Introduction: Survival rates continue to improve after allogeneic HCT (Gooley et al, NEJM, 2013). Population-based studies also indicate overall improvement in survival of older (60-80 years old) AML patients (pts) (Bower, Blood Cancer Journal, 2016). Yet, only a small minority (6%-8%) of them receive HCT (Medeiros, Ann Hematol. 2015). Given these potentially incongruent findings and the changing face of survival in AML, we designed the first prospective multi-center longitudinal study dating from first presentation of adults with AML to be treated at one of 13 different referral centers that provide both AML treatment and HCT. We compared survival according to whether or not pts received HCT at later time points. Methods: We enrolled 695 pts (Table 1). Data on demographics, AML status, cytogenetic risks per European Leukemia Network (ELN), and response; age; comorbidities per the HCT-comorbidity index (CI); function including activities of daily living (ADL); frailty; geriatric assessment including cognition; QOL including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant Scale (FACT-BMT), Euro-QOL 5-Dimension scale, ENRICHD Social Support Instrument, Social Activity Log, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9) were collected at enrollment and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. We used time-dependent Cox regression analyses to identify baseline and time-dependent risk factors associated with mortality in the overall population. The factors identified as significantly associated with mortality (p 〈 0.05) were used to develop multivariate models examining the association between HCT and mortality within 1) the general population as well as those with 2) intermediate vs 3) unfavorable ELN risk, and 4) vulnerable pts (age ≥60 years or HCT-CI scores ≥4). The latter group constituted the majority (76%). In these analyses, all pts were considered to be in the non-HCT group until receipt of HCT at which time they enter the HCT group. The contribution of deaths to the hazard ratio (HR) for HCT reflects the relative number and characteristics of pts remaining at risk in the two groups at the time a death occurs. Results: Median follow-up was 16.8 months (range 0.1-52.4). In the initial multivariate analyses, the following were identified as significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (Table 2): HCT-CI scores ≥5 (p 〈 0.0001), age ≥70 years (p 〈 0.0001), intermediate (p=0.03) and high ELN risk (p 〈 0.0001), relapsed/refractory AML at enrollment (p=0.0005), relapse or refractory response to initial treatment after enrollment (p 〈 0.0001), frailty per walk test (p=0.004), impaired QOL per FACT-G scores (p=0.02), increased depression per PHQ-9 (p=0.03), and dependent status per ADL scores 〈 14 (p=0.05). Survival after HCT was 58% at 2-years. Initial unadjusted analyses showed significantly lower risks of mortality in association with receiving allogeneic HCT (p=0.0003). These findings were similar in pts with intermediate (p=0.0005) or unfavorable (p 〈 0.0001) ELN risk and in vulnerable pts (p 〈 0.0001) (Table 3). However, in the adjusted models, the advantage of HCT in reducing mortality rates was lost both in the overall population (p=0.21, see figure) as well as in the other groups (p 〉 0.54, 0.40, and 0.51, respectively, Table 3). Formal tests of interactions (Table 3) showed no statistically compelling evidence that the association of HCT and mortality varies with respect to the timing of mortality or to the underlying ELN risk. Conclusions: In a prospective observational study, adjusting for key AML-specific and pt-specific variables negated the observed benefit of HCT over non-HCT therapies in reducing mortality rates among AML pts. Our results might reflect 1) improvement in supportive care and non-HCT therapies, 2) a relatively high non-relapse mortality early after HCT and the need for longer follow-up to demonstrate an adjusted benefit of HCT, and 3) the high selectivity of the transplant eligibility process, as we accounted here for variables that are often ignored in "genetic assignment" randomized studies (i.e. comorbidities and function). New randomized trials are needed; however, these trials have to be more inclusive of vulnerable pts and measure pt-specific variables. Trials focusing on reducing burden of comorbidities, frailty and poor function are needed alongside trials to treat AML with or without HCT. Disclosures Gerds: Celgene: Consultancy; Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Shami:JSK Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baston Biologics Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lone Star Biotherapies: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Consultancy. Rizzieri:Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Wang:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Faderl:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Koprivnikar:Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Consultancy. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.

Abstract: While the therapeutic activity of the deoxycytidine analogue decitabine is thought to reflect its ability to reactivate methylation-silenced genes, this agent is also known to trigger p53-dependent DNA damage responses. Here, we report that p53-inducible ribonucleotide reductase (p53R2/RRM2B) is a robust transcriptional target of decitabine. In cancer cells, decitabine treatment induces p53R2 mRNA expression, protein expression, and promoter activity in a p53-dependent manner. The mechanism of p53R2 gene induction by decitabine does not seem to be promoter DNA hypomethylation, as the p53R2 5′ CpG island is hypomethylated before treatment. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) in wild-type p53 cells leads to genomic DNA hypomethylation but does not induce p53R2, suggesting that DNMT/DNA adduct formation is the molecular trigger for p53R2 induction. Consistent with this idea, only nucleoside-based DNMT inhibitors that form covalent DNA adducts induce p53R2 expression. siRNA targeting of p53R2 reduces the extent of cell cycle arrest following decitabine treatment, supporting a functional role for p53R2 in decitabine-mediated cellular responses. To determine the clinical relevance of p53R2 induction, we measured p53R2 expression in bone marrow samples from 15 myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia (MDS/AML) patients undergoing decitabine therapy. p53R2 mRNA and protein were induced in 7 of 13 (54%) and 6 of 9 (67%) patients analyzed, respectively, despite a lack of methylation changes in the p53R2 promoter. Most notably, there was a significant association (P = 0.0047) between p53R2 mRNA induction and clinical response in MDS/AML. These data establish p53R2 as a novel hypomethylation-independent decitabine gene target associated with clinical response. [Cancer Res 2008;68(22):9358–66]