GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 11
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Copernicus Publications
    In:  EPIC3Earth System Science Data, Copernicus Publications, 7(1), pp. 47-85, ISSN: 1866-3516
    Publication Date: 2019-10-04
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Article , isiRev , info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 12
    Publication Date: 2021-10-07
    Description: Land use and climate changes both affect terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we used three combinations of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP1xRCP26, SSP3xRCP60, and SSP5xRCP85) as input to three dynamic global vegetation models to assess the impacts and associated uncertainty on several ecosystem functions: terrestrial carbon storage and fluxes, evapotranspiration, surface albedo, and runoff. We also performed sensitivity simulations in which we kept either land use or climate (including atmospheric CO2) constant from year 2015 on to calculate the isolated land use versus climate effects. By the 2080–2099 period, carbon storage increases by up to 87 ± 47 Gt (SSP1xRCP26) compared to present day, with large spatial variance across scenarios and models. Most of the carbon uptake is attributed to drivers beyond future land use and climate change, particularly the lagged effects of historic environmental changes. Future climate change typically increases carbon stocks in vegetation but not soils, while future land use change causes carbon losses, even for net agricultural abandonment (SSP1xRCP26). Evapotranspiration changes are highly variable across scenarios, and models do not agree on the magnitude or even sign of change of the individual effects. A calculated decrease in January and July surface albedo (up to −0.021 ± 0.007 and −0.004 ± 0.004 for SSP5xRCP85) and increase in runoff (+67 ± 6 mm/year) is largely driven by climate change. Overall, our results show that future land use and climate change will both have substantial impacts on ecosystem functioning. However, future changes can often not be fully explained by these two drivers and legacy effects have to be considered.
    Keywords: 333.7 ; 551.6 ; land use change ; climate change projections ; terrestrial ecosystems ; vegetation modeling ; ecosystem service indicators ; legacy effects
    Language: English
    Type: map
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 13
    Publication Date: 2021-10-02
    Description: Ecosystems continuously adapt to interacting environmental drivers that change over time. Consequently, the carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystem may presently still be affected by past anthropogenic disturbances (e.g., deforestation) and other environmental changes (e.g., climate change). However, even though such so-called “legacy effects” are implicitly included in many carbon cycle modeling studies, they are typically not explicitly quantified and therefore scientists might not be aware of their long-term importance. Here, we use the ecosystem model LPJ-GUESS to quantify legacy effects for the 21st century and the respective contributions of the following environmental drivers: climate change, CO2 fertilization, land use change, wood harvest, nitrogen deposition, and nitrogen fertilization. According to our simulations, the combined legacy effects of historical (1850–2015) environmental changes result in a land carbon uptake of +126 Gt C over the future (2015–2099) period. This by far exceeds the impacts of future environmental changes (range −53 Gt C to +16 Gt C for three scenarios) and is comparable in magnitude to historical carbon losses (−154 Gt C). Legacy effects can mainly be attributed to ecosystems still adapting to historical increases in atmospheric CO2 (+65 Gt C) and nitrogen deposition (+33 Gt C), but long-term vegetation regrowth following agricultural abandonment (+8 Gt C) and wood harvest (+19 Gt C) also play a role. The response of the biosphere to historical environmental changes dominates future terrestrial carbon cycling at least until midcentury. Legacy effects persist many decades after environmental changes occurred and need to be considered when interpreting changes and estimating terrestrial carbon uptake potentials.
    Keywords: 333.7 ; ecosystem modeling ; environmental drivers ; carbon sink ; lagged response ; ecosystem equilibrium ; committed change
    Language: English
    Type: map
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 14
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Cambridge University Press
    In:  EPIC3https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/, Cambridge University Press, pp. 197-377
    Publication Date: 2023-04-17
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Inbook , peerRev
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 15
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    Earth System Knowledge Platform
    Publication Date: 2021-02-02
    Description: Wie erfolgversprechend ist der Gesetzesvorschlag der EU-Kommission, Europa bis 2050 klimaneutral zu machen? Ein Kommentar von Prof. Almut Arneth und Prof. Harald Kunstmann vom Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT).
    Language: German
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/other
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 16
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  Biodiversität im Meer und an Land. Vom Wert biologischer Vielfalt
    Publication Date: 2020-12-15
    Description: Eines scheint sicher: Die wachsende Weltbevölkerung wird sich wohl ernähren können, wenn weiterhin die Erträge gesteigert werden und gleichzeitig Armut reduziert wird. Allerdings ist die Produktion von Nahrungsmitteln derzeit entkoppelt von einer nachhaltigen Land- und Meeresnutzung. Sie verschlechtert andere Leistungen, die Ökosysteme erbringen und trägt erheblich zum Verlust von Biodiversität bei. Der Klimawandel wird in Zukunft ein weiterer Aspekt sein, der berücksichtigt werden muss. Insbesondere die monokulturelle Aufforstung und der zusätzliche, großskalige Anbau von Bioenergiepflanzen sind laut des Berichtes des Weltbiodiversitätsrates kritisch zu sehen. ■ Die großflächige Umnutzung von Flächen für Aufforstung bzw. Bioenergie steht in direkter Konkurrenz zur Produktion von Nahrungsmitteln. Eine Vielzahl von Studien weist auf potentiell stark negative Nebeneffekte hin. ■ Insbesondere die großflächige Aufforstung zum Anbau von Bioenergiepflanzen (z.B. Mais, Zuckerrohr oder Elefantengras) oder aber die Schaffung von großen Waldmonokulturen ist problematisch. ■ Nachhaltig sind Szenarien, die von einem reduzierten Fleischkonsum in den Industrienationen und stark verminderten Emissionen von Treibhausgasen ausgehen. Sie zeigen, dass der Verlust an Biodiversität dann stark eingedämmt werden könnte.
    Language: German
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...