GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • carbon cycle  (2)
Document type
Keywords
Language
Years
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2022-05-26
    Description: © The Author(s), 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Heaton, T. J., Koehler, P., Butzin, M., Bard, E., Reimer, R. W., Austin, W. E. N., Ramsey, C. B., Grootes, P. M., Hughen, K. A., Kromer, B., Reimer, P. J., Adkins, J., Burke, A., Cook, M. S., Olsen, J., & Skinner, L. C. Marine20-the marine radiocarbon age calibration curve (0-55,000 cal BP). Radiocarbon, 62(4), (2020): 779-820, doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.68.
    Description: The concentration of radiocarbon (14C) differs between ocean and atmosphere. Radiocarbon determinations from samples which obtained their 14C in the marine environment therefore need a marine-specific calibration curve and cannot be calibrated directly against the atmospheric-based IntCal20 curve. This paper presents Marine20, an update to the internationally agreed marine radiocarbon age calibration curve that provides a non-polar global-average marine record of radiocarbon from 0–55 cal kBP and serves as a baseline for regional oceanic variation. Marine20 is intended for calibration of marine radiocarbon samples from non-polar regions; it is not suitable for calibration in polar regions where variability in sea ice extent, ocean upwelling and air-sea gas exchange may have caused larger changes to concentrations of marine radiocarbon. The Marine20 curve is based upon 500 simulations with an ocean/atmosphere/biosphere box-model of the global carbon cycle that has been forced by posterior realizations of our Northern Hemispheric atmospheric IntCal20 14C curve and reconstructed changes in CO2 obtained from ice core data. These forcings enable us to incorporate carbon cycle dynamics and temporal changes in the atmospheric 14C level. The box-model simulations of the global-average marine radiocarbon reservoir age are similar to those of a more complex three-dimensional ocean general circulation model. However, simplicity and speed of the box model allow us to use a Monte Carlo approach to rigorously propagate the uncertainty in both the historic concentration of atmospheric 14C and other key parameters of the carbon cycle through to our final Marine20 calibration curve. This robust propagation of uncertainty is fundamental to providing reliable precision for the radiocarbon age calibration of marine based samples. We make a first step towards deconvolving the contributions of different processes to the total uncertainty; discuss the main differences of Marine20 from the previous age calibration curve Marine13; and identify the limitations of our approach together with key areas for further work. The updated values for ΔR, the regional marine radiocarbon reservoir age corrections required to calibrate against Marine20, can be found at the data base http://calib.org/marine/.
    Description: We would like to thank Jeremy Oakley and Richard Bintanja for informative discussions during the development of this work. T.J. Heaton is supported by a Leverhulme Trust Fellowship RF-2019-140\9, “Improving the Measurement of Time Using Radiocarbon”. M Butzin is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), as Research for Sustainability initiative (FONA); www.fona.de through the PalMod project (grant numbers: 01LP1505B, 01LP1919A). E. Bard is supported by EQUIPEX ASTER-CEREGE and ANR CARBOTRYDH. Meetings of the IntCal Marine Focus group have been supported by Collège de France. Data are available on the PANGAEA database at doi:10.159/ANGAEA.914500.
    Keywords: Bayesian modeling ; calibration ; carbon cycle ; computer model ; marine environment
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2023-09-13
    Description: Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉) beyond ice core records have been reconstructed from δ〈sup〉11〈/sup〉B derived from planktic foraminifera found in equatorial sediment cores. Here, I applied a carbon cycle model over the Plio‐Pleistocene to evaluate the assumptions leading to these numbers. During glacials times, simulated atmospheric pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 was unequilibrated with pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 in the equatorial surface ocean by up to 35 ppm while the δ〈sup〉11〈/sup〉B‐based approaches assume unchanged (quasi)equilibrium between both. In the Pliocene, δ〈sup〉11〈/sup〉B‐based estimates of surface ocean pH are lower in the Pacific than in the Atlantic resulting in higher calculated pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉. This offset in pH between ocean basins is not supported by models. To calculate pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 in surface waters out of the δ〈sup〉11〈/sup〉B‐based pH some assumptions on either total alkalinity or dissolved inorganic carbon are necessary. However, the assumed values of these under‐constrained variables were according to my results partly inconsistent with chemically possible combinations within the marine carbonate system. The model results show glacial/interglacial variability in total alkalinity of the order of 100 μmol/kg, which is rarely applied to proxy reconstructions. Simulated atmospheric pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 is tightly (r〈sup〉2〈/sup〉 〉 0.9) related to equatorial surface‐ocean pH, which can be used for consistency checks. Long‐term trends in volcanic CO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 outgassing and the strength of the continental weathering fluxes are still unconstrained, allowing for a wide range of possible atmospheric pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 across the Plio‐Pleistocene. Nevertheless, this carbon cycle analysis suggests that reported atmospheric pCO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 above 500 ppm in the Pliocene might, for various reasons, need to be revised to smaller numbers.
    Description: Key Points: Simulated equatorial surface ocean 𝑝CO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 is near‐equilibrium with atmosphere during interglacials but enriched (≤35 ppm) during glacials. Models suggest similar equatorial surface 𝑝H in Pacific and in Atlantic in high CO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 worlds while Pliocene reconstructions show offsets. Carbon cycle model analysis suggests that reported CO〈sub〉2〈/sub〉 values above 500 ppm in the Pliocene might need revisions to smaller numbers.
    Keywords: ddc:551 ; carbon cycle ; modeling ; CO2 ; boron isotopes ; pH ; Plio‐Pleistocene
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...