GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2010
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 28, No. 27 ( 2010-09-20), p. 4255-4267
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 28, No. 27 ( 2010-09-20), p. 4255-4267
    Abstract: Knowledge of the inherited risk for cancer is an important component of preventive oncology. In addition to well-established syndromes of cancer predisposition, much remains to be discovered about the genetic variation underlying susceptibility to common malignancies. Increased knowledge about the human genome and advances in genotyping technology have made possible genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of human diseases. These studies have identified many important regions of genetic variation associated with an increased risk for human traits and diseases including cancer. Understanding the principles, major findings, and limitations of GWAS is becoming increasingly important for oncologists as dissemination of genomic risk tests directly to consumers is already occurring through commercial companies. GWAS have contributed to our understanding of the genetic basis of cancer and will shed light on biologic pathways and possible new strategies for targeted prevention. To date, however, the clinical utility of GWAS-derived risk markers remains limited.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3037-3037
    Abstract: 3037 Background: Less than 20% of cancers are diagnosed as a result of standard-of-care (SOC) screening in the US. MCED tests may expand screening to more cancers, but the long-term outcomes of MCED test-detected cancers are unknown. DETECT-A was the first large prospective interventional clinical trial to evaluate an MCED blood test. The test used was an early version of CancerSEEK and was evaluated in 9,911 women without history of cancer ( Science 369:6499, 2020). CancerSEEK, coupled with diagnostic PET-CT, safely identified cancers including those not detected by SOC screening, the majority of which were localized or regional. This follow-up observational study evaluated longitudinal clinical outcomes of cancers diagnosed as a result of an abnormal CancerSEEK test with a median follow up of 4.4 (IQR:4.1-4.6) years from initial CancerSEEK testing. Methods: Nine cancer types were diagnosed in 26 participants whose cancers were first detected by CancerSEEK. Information on cancer diagnosis, treatment, treatment response, remission status, recurrence, secondary cancer diagnoses, and mortality (cancer-related and all-cause) was extracted from electronic medical records through November 2022. Data collection for living participants took place a median of 3.7 years following cancer diagnosis (IQR: 3.3-3.9) and a median of 4.3 years (IQR: 4.1-4.7) following initial CancerSEEK screen. Results: Fourteen (53.8%) participants underwent surgery; 5 had surgery alone, 9 had surgery with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, or hormone therapy. Twelve of 14 (85.7%) surgically treated participants were in remission as of November 2022, including 10 with localized or regional disease at diagnosis. Among patients whose treatment was non-surgical (11) or unknown (1), 1 (8.3%) was in remission (stage I at diagnosis), 9 (75.0%) were deceased (all stage III or IV at diagnosis), and 2 (16.7%) were in surveillance or ongoing treatment (stage II and stage III at diagnosis). Overall, 13 of 26 (50%) participants were in remission [ovarian (4), thyroid (1), uterus (2), breast (1), colorectal (2), and lung (3)] ; 7 of these 13 (54%) had cancers without recommended SOC screening modalities. Eleven of 17 (64.7%) participants with localized or regional disease (stage I, II, or III) were in remission, whereas 2 of 9 (22.2%) with stage IV disease at diagnosis were in remission. Conclusions: CancerSEEK detected cancers earlier in patients who, when treated subsequently with conventional methods, achieved long-term survival. Half of all patients with a CancerSEEK-detected cancer remain cancer-free after treatment 〉 4 years (median) after their initial CancerSEEK test. This includes 7 patients with cancer types for which no SOC screening option exists. Additional biomarkers, new analytic methods and algorithms are being incorporated in the development of the next generation of the MCED test.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 3039-3039
    Abstract: 3039 Background: Recommended standard of care (SOC) early detection tests are solely available for four cancer types and fewer than 20% of incident cancers in the US are being diagnosed as a result of screening. Advances in detection of tumor-derived analytes in the blood are enabling the development of MCED tests that may expand early cancer detection. While MCED tests are being designed with high specificity, false positive (FP) results remain a concern for clinicians and patients alike, as no long-term outcomes of individuals with a FP MCED test have been reported. DETECT-A was the first prospective interventional clinical trial to evaluate an MCED blood test. The test used was an early version of CancerSEEK, evaluated in 9,911 women without history of cancer ( Science, 369:6499, 2020). This prospectively planned analysis evaluates cancer incidence among DETECT-A participants with FP results, with the intention of providing key long-term data on test effectiveness. Methods: This analysis included 98 DETECT-A participants with FP results, where a FP was defined as a positive CancerSEEK result with subsequent PET-CT and clinical evaluation with no evidence of cancer within 1 year of the initial CancerSEEK test. Sixty-three of 98 participants had no follow-up procedure performed after imaging, and 35 subjects had noninvasive/minimally invasive follow-up procedures performed. Electronic medical records were analyzed from January 2020 through November 2022 for cancer diagnosis, treatment, remission, recurrence, and mortality. Results: Ninety-six of 98 participants with a FP result remained free of cancer with a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR: 3.9-4.9) from the initial CancerSEEK test. One stage I breast cancer and one stage III ovarian cancer were diagnosed 2.7 and 2.9 years respectively from the initial CancerSEEK test. Conclusions: Patients with a negative PET-CT and initial clinical evaluation after a positive CancerSEEK test had low ( 〈 1% per year) risk for cancer in the ensuing four years after the initial CancerSEEK test. If confirmed, this result should prove reassuring to clinicians and to patients who have no evidence of cancer on comprehensive imaging following a positive MCED test. Further, these results provide preliminary support for the recommendation that patients who participate in MCED testing and receive a FP result can safely return to routine care after comprehensive anatomic and functional imaging and clinical evaluation reveal no suspicion of cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...