In:
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, PAGEPress Publications, Vol. 93, No. 3 ( 2021-09-30), p. 262-267
Abstract:
Objective: We aimed to establish the reliability of technique selection strategy for ureteroileal anastomosis (Bricker vs. Wallace) by comparing perioperative outcomes, complications, and anastomotic stricture rate in a contemporary series of patients who underwent open radical cystectomy followed by reconstruction of modified Hautmann neobladder. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients underwent radical cystectomy and modified Hautmann neobladder, of whom 30 patients (group I) with Bricker anastomotic technique were compared to 30 matched paired patients with end-to-end ureteroileal anastomosis (group II). Long-term results, including ureteroileal stricture (UIS) and postoperative complication rate at two year follow up were available. The choice of anastomosis type was successively based on chimney size, ureteral length after retro-sigmoidal tunneling and diameter of distal ureter. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: Ureteroileal stricture rate was 6.6% in group I vs. 0% in group II, after three months (p 〈 0.05), while anastomotic leakage rate was 6.6% vs. 3.3% (group I vs group II) between the two groups for the same follow up period (p 〉 0.05). High-grade complications (Clavien III-V) were more in Bricker group as compared to Wallace group and the difference was significant (20% vs 10.3%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Our preliminary outcomes demonstrate that this selection strategy seems to be clinically reliable, with lower incidence of postoperative complications in Wallace group.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2282-4197
,
1124-3562
DOI:
10.4081/aiua.2021.3.262
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
PAGEPress Publications
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2811868-6
Permalink
